Angell, I. O. (1978). The megalithic yard: fact or fiction?. MASCA J 1. Vol 1, pp. 82-84.

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
The megalithic yard: fact or fiction?
Issue
Issue
The name of the volume or issue
Issue:
MASCA J 1
Series
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
MASCA Journal
Volume
Volume
Volume number and part
Volume:
1
Page Start/End
Page Start/End
The start and end page numbers.
Page Start/End:
82 - 84
Biblio Note
Biblio Note
This is a Bibliographic record only.
Biblio Note
Please note that this is a bibliographic record only, as originally entered into the BIAB database. The ADS have no files for download, and unfortunately cannot advise further on where to access hard copy or digital versions.
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Journal
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:
Strongly questions the validity of the statistical analysis by which Alexander Thom has deduced the existence of a Megalithic Yard accurate to + 0.003 feet used for laying out many of the stone rings throughout Britain. The data used by Thom himself - the diameters of 145 circles - cannot be tested by a simple quantum hypothesis: at each site one has to consider not just the intended value of the measuring unit, but also the number of units making up the diameter. For large circles, two different units, only slightly differing in value, can both be fitted an integral number of times to the measured diameter; the inclusion of these sites in the analysis leads to artificially small residual errors and hence to an overestimate of the accuracy of the supposed measuring unit. This and other problems lead to the conclusion that by Broadbent's criterion Thom's case for an accurate MY is unproven. C R
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:
Ian O Angell
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
1978
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
BIAB (British Archaeological Abstracts (BAA))
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
05 Dec 2008