Masser, P. and Evans, J. (2005). Excavations within the vicus settlement at Burgh by Sands, 2002.. Transactions of the Cumberland & Westmorland Antiquarian & Archaeological Society 5 (series 3). Vol 5, pp. 31-64. https://doi.org/10.5284/1064555. Cite this via datacite
Title The title of the publication or report |
Excavations within the vicus settlement at Burgh by Sands, 2002. | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Transactions of the Cumberland & Westmorland Antiquarian & Archaeological Society 5 (series 3) | |||||||||||||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Transactions of the Cumberland & Westmorland Antiquarian & Archaeological Society | |||||||||||||
Volume Volume number and part |
5 | |||||||||||||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
31 - 64 | |||||||||||||
Downloads Any files associated with the publication or report that can be downloaded from the ADS |
|
|||||||||||||
Licence Type ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC. |
ADS Terms of Use and Access
|
|||||||||||||
DOI The DOI (digital object identifier) for the publication or report. |
|
|||||||||||||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | |||||||||||||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
Report on an excavation at Amberfield, Burgh by Sands, in 2002, approximately 200m to the south of Hadrian's Wall and Burgh II. A considerable settlement of later second- to third-century date, believed to be part of the vicus, had been identified immediately to the east by previous archaeological investigations. Features excavated included a well, four deep pits interpreted as post-pits for a substantial building lying mainly to the north of the excavation area, postholes and beamslots relating to timber buildings, and shallow ditches and gullies which appear to be boundary features. Finds from the site are consistent with the interpretation of the site as part of the vicus, and dated its occupation to the second half of the second century. The implications for the dating of the Burgh II fort are discussed. Includes | |||||||||||||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2005 | |||||||||||||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
|||||||||||||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
ADS Archive
(ADS Archive)
|
|||||||||||||
Relations Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report |
|
|||||||||||||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
22 Mar 2006 |