Aitchison, K. R. and Bell, S. (2001). An Archaeological Field Evaluation at Low Matlock Mill, Loxley Valley, Sheffield. Archaeological Research & Consultancy at the University of Sheffield (ARCUS). https://doi.org/10.5284/1076533. Cite this using datacite

Title The title of the publication or report Title:	An Archaeological Field Evaluation at Low Matlock Mill, Loxley Valley, Sheffield
Series The series the publication or report is included in Series:	Archaeological Research and Consultancy at the University of Sheffield (ARCUS) unpublished report series
Number of Pages The number of pages in the publication or report Number of Pages:	22
Downloads Any files associated with the publication or report that can be downloaded from the ADS Downloads:	arcus2-36192_1.pdf (87 kB) : Download arcus2-36192_2.pdf (467 kB) : Download
Licence Type ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC. Licence Type:	ADS Terms of Use and Access
DOI The DOI (digital object identifier) for the publication or report. DOI	https://doi.org/10.5284/1076533
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book Publication Type:	Report (in Series)
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report Abstract:	Little Matlock Hamlet was granted planning permission and Listed Building consent, subject to a Section 106 agreement, for a development at Low Matlock Wheel. A desk-based assessment had identified a complex history of buildings at the site, focussed around a series of water-powered mills on the River Loxley. The earliest documented mill on the site dated from the first half of the 18th century. The site was badly damaged and then largely rebuilt following the Great Sheffield Flood of 1864. The mill buildings on site incorporated the last water-powered steel rolling mill in Sheffield. The mill buildings were grade II* listed, while a row of cottages above the mill which partly dated from the start of the 19th century and survived the flood were Grade II Listed. The mill buildings and associated water management features were within the area of a SAM. The evaluation was carried out in two areas where new building was intended. Two trenches were opened, exposing a total area of 104 sq. m. The evaluation revealed no archaeological deposits that would be disturbed by construction in the areas evaluated. [Au(adp)]
Author The authors of this publication or report Author:	Kenneth R Aitchison Sean Bell
Publisher The publisher of the publication or report Publisher:	Archaeological Research & Consultancy at the University of Sheffield (ARCUS)
Other Person/Org Other people or organisations for this publication or report Other Person/Org:	Historic England (OASIS Reviewer) South Yorkshire Archaeology Service (OASIS Reviewer)
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published Year of Publication:	2001
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. Locations:	Site: Low Matlock Mill, Loxley Valley County: South Yorkshire District: Sheffield Parish: BRADFIELD Country: England Location - Auto Detected: River Loxley Location - Auto Detected: Auadp Grid Reference: 430900, 389400 (Easting, Northing)
Subjects / Periods Subjects / Periods associated with this record. Subjects / Periods:	POST MEDIEVAL (Historic England Periods) MILL POND (Monument Type England) 18th Century (Auto Detected Temporal) 19th Century (Auto Detected Temporal) TRIAL TRENCH (Event)
Identifiers Identifiers associated with the publication. These might include DOIs, site codes, Monument Identifiers etc. Identifiers:	OASIS Id: arcus2-36192 OBIB: Report 597b.1
Note Extra information on the publication or report. Note:	Unpublished client report Note from AIP record: Date Of Issue From: 2001 Date Of Coverage From: 01 Date Of Coverage To: 01 Editorial Expansion: Site name: LOW MATLOCK MILL, LOXLEY VALLEY, SHEFFIELD Study area: Investigation type: Evaluation District: Sheffield Monument: Ngr: SK30908940, SK30508950 Parish: Bradfield Postcode: S6 6SE
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. Source:	OASIS (OASIS)
Relations Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report Relations:
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered Created Date:	30 Apr 2020

---