Mumford, J. (2013). Evaluation at Ambrosden Springfield Farm. Oxford: Oxford Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.5284/1112627. Cite this using datacite

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
Evaluation at Ambrosden Springfield Farm
Series
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
Oxford Archaeological Unit unpublished report series
Downloads
Downloads
Any files associated with the publication or report that can be downloaded from the ADS
Downloads:
oxfordar1-512520_208082.pdf (7 MB) : Download
Biblio Note
Biblio Note
This is a Bibliographic record only.
Biblio Note
This report was uploaded to the OASIS system by the named Publisher. The report has been transferred into the ADS Library for public access and to facilitate future research.
Licence Type
Licence Type
ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC.
Licence Type:
ADS Terms of Use and Access icon
ADS Terms of Use and Access
DOI
DOI
The DOI (digital object identifier) for the publication or report.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5284/1112627
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Report (in Series)
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:
The evaluation consisted of a series of trenches spread across the site. These were mostly 50m and 100m in length, but also including one 80m trench. Some were positioned over anomalies and features revealed in geophysical survey; others to obtain a reasonable coverage of the evaluated area in apparently blank areas. Trench positions were laid out using a GPS. All trenches were initially dug by 360 machine with a toothless bucket under close, constant archaeological supervision. Topsoil and subsoils were excavated and stored separately, and were replaced in their appropriate stratigraphic order once investigation was completed. Trenches were generally clean enough to photograph and plan following machining; a few were subsequently cleaned by hand in part to clarify possible features. Empty trenches (in this case only Trench 5) were not planned. Following planning at 1:50 and photography, possible archaeological features were sample-excavated by hand to investigate their depth, form, character and date. Plans and sections were drawn of hand-excavated interventions on permatrace. All trenches were levelled along their length. An archaeological evaluation was carried out at Springfield Farm, Ambrosden between 16th and 28th January 2013. The area of proposed development currently consists of open grassland, and is currently being considered for development for housing. Following a desk-based assessment of archaeological potential, and geophysical survey, an archaeological evaluation was carried out prior to the submission of a planning application. The scope of the evaluation was agreed with Richard Oram, planning archaeologist for Oxfordshire County Council, and consisted of 12 trenches varying between 50m and 100m in length, and totalling a 2% sample of the proposed development area. Trenches were laid out to target anomalies identified by the geophysical survey, and to provide an even coverage of the development area. The work was carried out over 9 working days in adverse conditions with a team of 2-7 archaeologists and a 360º mechanical excavator. The evaluation revealed several ditches in the north-east corner of the site, two of which included single sherds of Roman pottery. One other Roman sherd was found in a post-medieval ditch. The paucity of Roman sherds, and the absence of any other material of this date, indicates that these features were probably field boundaries remote from settlement. These ditches were cut by the furrows of medieval or post-medieval ridge-and furrow cultivation, which covered the whole of the area evaluated. No finds of medieval or early post-medieval date were recovered in association to refine this dating. Several later post-medieval field boundaries were also uncovered. The bulk of the geophysical anomalies proved to be either spreads of recent material associated with the levelling of the site after removal of these field boundaries, or in the case of the more amorphous anomalies, to have derived from animal activity associated with a series of pig sties that formerly ran along the edges of the field west of Springfield Farm.
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:
Jim Mumford
Publisher
Publisher
The publisher of the publication or report
Publisher:
Oxford Archaeology
Other Person/Org
Other Person/Org
Other people or organisations for this publication or report
Other Person/Org:
Oxfordshire HER (OASIS Reviewer)
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2013
Locations
Locations
Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published.
Locations:
Country: England
County: Oxfordshire
District: Cherwell
Parish: Ambrosden
Grid Reference: 460699, 219399 (Easting, Northing)
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods associated with this record.
Subjects / Periods:
BOUNDARY DITCH (Monument Type England)
UNCERTAIN ANIMAL REMAINS (Tag)
POST MEDIEVAL CERAMIC (Tag)
20TH CENTURY BOUNDARY DITCH (Tag)
UNCERTAIN DITCH (Tag)
ROMAN SHERD (Tag)
POST MEDIEVAL SHERD (Tag)
UNCERTAIN TREE THROW (Tag)
CLINKER (Object England)
RIDGE AND FURROW (Monument Type England)
CLAY PIPE (SMOKING) (Object England)
ROMAN DITCH (Tag)
POST MEDIEVAL CLAY PIPE (SMOKING) (Tag)
EVALUATION (Event)
UNCERTAIN METAL WORKING DEBRIS (Tag)
SHERD (Object England)
20TH CENTURY (Historic England Periods)
ROMAN (Historic England Periods)
POST MEDIEVAL (Historic England Periods)
UNCERTAIN (Historic England Periods)
DITCH (Monument Type England)
UNCERTAIN RIDGE AND FURROW (Tag)
CERAMIC (Object England)
METAL WORKING DEBRIS (Object England)
UNCERTAIN CLINKER (Tag)
TREE THROW (Monument Type England)
ANIMAL REMAINS (Object England)
20TH CENTURY DITCH (Tag)
POST MEDIEVAL BOUNDARY DITCH (Tag)
Identifiers
Identifiers
Identifiers associated with the publication. These might include DOIs, site codes, Monument Identifiers etc.
Identifiers:
OASIS Id: oxfordar1-512520
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
OASIS (OASIS)
Relations
Relations
Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report
Relations:
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
16 Aug 2023