Dodd, M. (2022). Evaluation at St Edmund Hall, Norham Gardens, Oxford. Oxford: Oxford Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.5284/1116114. Cite this using datacite

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
Evaluation at St Edmund Hall, Norham Gardens, Oxford
Series
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
Oxford Archaeological Unit unpublished report series
Downloads
Downloads
Any files associated with the publication or report that can be downloaded from the ADS
Downloads:
oxfordar1-515803_211561.pdf (3 MB) : Download
Biblio Note
Biblio Note
This is a Bibliographic record only.
Biblio Note
This report was uploaded to the OASIS system by the named Publisher. The report has not been reviewed by the relevant HER. The report has been transferred into the ADS Library for public access and to facilitate future research.
Licence Type
Licence Type
ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC.
Licence Type:
ADS Terms of Use and Access icon
ADS Terms of Use and Access
DOI
DOI
The DOI (digital object identifier) for the publication or report.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5284/1116114
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Report (in Series)
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:
The investigation comprised the excavation of five trenches, each measuring 1.8m wide and between 5m and 15m in length (Fig. 2). The trenches were initially laid out using a GPS with sub‐15mm accuracy. Due to the proximity to existing flower beds, Trench 1 was moved 0.5m to the north‐east of its original position. Trench 4 was also amended following the exposure of numerous tree roots during excavation. Its final layout included an extension to the north‐west, the position of which required the consideration of a mature hedge and a foul water service known to be in this location. Due to access constraints, the trenches were excavated using a 1.8 ton mechanical excavator fitted with a toothless bucket under the direct supervision of an archaeologist. The machine was tracked around the site on plastic ground protection boards to prevent unnecessary damage to the existing landscaping. Spoil was stored adjacent to, but at a safe distance from the trench edges. Turf and topsoil were stored separately on one side of the trench and subsoil on the other. Machining continued in even spits down to the top of the undisturbed natural geology or the first archaeological horizon, depending upon which was encountered first. The exposed surface was sufficiently cleaned to establish the presence/absence of archaeological remains. Once archaeological deposits had been exposed, further excavation proceeded by hand. Oxford Archaeology was commissioned by Turnberry on behalf of St Edmund Hall Design and Build Ltd to undertake a trial trench evaluation at the site of a proposed development at St Edmund Hall, Norham Gardens, Oxford. The work comprised the excavation of five trenches targeted within the footprint of the proposed development. The fieldwork was undertaken over the course of five days, between 23 and 27 May 2022. The earliest activity on the site was represented by three pieces of struck flint recovered from Trench 3. Although these were found as residual artefacts, they have been broadly identified as Neolithic to Bronze Age in date. Several ditches apparently forming part of a rectilinear enclosure system were revealed in Trenches 1 and 3. Only a small quantity of early to mid‐Roman pottery was recovered from one of these ditches but based on their appearance and alignment it is thought likely that they were broadly contemporary and Roman in date. The NE‐SW and NW‐SE alignments of these ditches fit well with the cropmark features recorded in University Parks to the south and they are likely to be related. Two larger features of uncertain extent were also revealed in the north‐east of the site in Trench 4, but no dating evidence was recovered. Varying levels of overburden across the site demonstrate that various landscaping and terracing work associated with the construction of the hall have had a reasonable impact on the topography and deposits. However, the archaeological remains appear unaffected by this landscaping. Although they are likely to have been truncated by medieval and post‐medieval agricultural activity in the area.
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:
Mark Dodd
Publisher
Publisher
The publisher of the publication or report
Publisher:
Oxford Archaeology
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2022
Locations
Locations
Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published.
Locations:
Parish: Oxford, unparished area
Country: England
District: Oxford
County: Oxfordshire
Grid Reference: 451509, 207515 (Easting, Northing)
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods associated with this record.
Subjects / Periods:
DITCH (Monument Type England)
PIT (Monument Type England)
CERAMIC (Object England)
BRONZE AGE LITHIC IMPLEMENT (Tag)
BODY SHERD (Object England)
POST MEDIEVAL BODY SHERD (Tag)
LITHIC IMPLEMENT (Object England)
UNCERTAIN PIT (Tag)
ROMAN DITCH (Tag)
EVALUATION (Event)
SHERD (Object England)
UNCERTAIN DITCH (Tag)
MEDIEVAL CERAMIC (Tag)
ROMAN SHERD (Tag)
BRONZE AGE (Historic England Periods)
ROMAN (Historic England Periods)
MEDIEVAL (Historic England Periods)
POST MEDIEVAL (Historic England Periods)
UNCERTAIN (Historic England Periods)
Identifiers
Identifiers
Identifiers associated with the publication. These might include DOIs, site codes, Monument Identifiers etc.
Identifiers:
OASIS Id: oxfordar1-515803
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
OASIS (OASIS)
Relations
Relations
Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report
Relations:
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
30 Nov 2023