Parker, A. (2023). South Church Enterprise Park, Bishop Auckland, County Durham Archaeological Evaluation Report. Lancaster: Oxford Archaeology (North). https://doi.org/10.5284/1116260. Cite this using datacite

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
South Church Enterprise Park, Bishop Auckland, County Durham Archaeological Evaluation Report
Series
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
Oxford Archaeology North unpublished report series
Downloads
Downloads
Any files associated with the publication or report that can be downloaded from the ADS
Downloads:
oxfordar2-517982_213738.pdf (5 MB) : Download
Biblio Note
Biblio Note
This is a Bibliographic record only.
Biblio Note
This report was uploaded to the OASIS system by the named Publisher. The report has not been reviewed by the relevant HER. The report has been transferred into the ADS Library for public access and to facilitate future research.
Licence Type
Licence Type
ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC.
Licence Type:
ADS Terms of Use and Access icon
ADS Terms of Use and Access
DOI
DOI
The DOI (digital object identifier) for the publication or report.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5284/1116260
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Report (in Series)
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:
The full methodology is outlined in the WSI (Appendix A) and was adhered to in full, and, as such, was fully compliant with prevailing guidelines and established industry best practice (CIfA 2020a; 2020b; 2022; Historic England 2015). A programme of field observation accurately recorded the character of the deposits within the evaluation. The trial trench evaluation was to consist of the excavation of ten 30m by 2m trenches within the proposed site, with the principal aim being to identify whether archaeological remains survive within the site (Fig. 2). The trench array was designed to avoid service constraints, namely a drain that crossed the site from east to west. The evaluation trenches were to be set out by a real-time kinematic (RTK) global navigation satellite system (GNSS), accurate to 0.02-0.03m based upon the agreed positions. Technical issues prevented this and it was agreed that trenches could be located ‘by eye’ as they were not targeted on any specific features and the sample would still be achieved; two of the trenches, unfortunately, fell outside of the proposed redline boundary of the site (Fig 2). Trenches were opened by mechanical excavator fitted with a toothless ditching bucket. The top and subsoil deposits were removed and bunded separately on opposite sides of the trench to await backfill. Excavation was to continue to an appropriate depth; when natural geology was reached, significant archaeological remains were discovered or to a maximum safe working depth of 1m. All excavator operations were monitored by a trained, experienced archaeologist. Subsequent cleaning and investigation of the trenches was undertaken manually, using either hoes, shovel scraping, and/or trowels depending on subsoil conditions. Had features of archaeological interest been identified they would have been sample excavated. All information identified during the course of the fieldwork was recorded stratigraphically, using a system adapted from that used by the former English Heritage Centre for Archaeology with an accompanying pictorial record (digital photographs). Primary records were available for inspection at all times. Results of all field investigations were recorded on pro forma context sheets. The site archive includes both photographic images and accurate large-scale plans and sections at appropriate scales (1:50; 1:20; and 1:10). A full professional archive has been compiled in accordance with the WSI (Appendix A), and in accordance with current CIfA (2020b) and Historic England (2015) guidelines. The archive will be deposited with the County Durham Archaeological Collections Store upon completion of the project. An online access to index of archaeological investigations (OASIS) form will also be uploaded, along with a copy of this report. The principal aim of the archaeological works was to identify whether any archaeological remains survived on the site, and if they did, to what level they survived. Although there were technical issues with the survey equipment, all ten proposed trenches were excavated with no hindrance. However, no archaeological remains were encountered within any of the trenches. As such, the site is of low significance.
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:
Adam Parker ORCID icon
Publisher
Publisher
The publisher of the publication or report
Publisher:
Oxford Archaeology (North)
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2023
Locations
Locations
Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published.
Locations:
Parish: Dene Valley
District: County Durham
Country: England
County: County Durham
County: Durham
Grid Reference: 421197, 527820 (Easting, Northing)
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods associated with this record.
Subjects / Periods:
EVALUATION (Event)
Identifiers
Identifiers
Identifiers associated with the publication. These might include DOIs, site codes, Monument Identifiers etc.
Identifiers:
OASIS Id: oxfordar2-517982
Report id: 2022-23/2247
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
OASIS (OASIS)
Relations
Relations
Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report
Relations:
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
18 Dec 2023