Data copyright © High Speed Two Ltd. unless otherwise stated
This work is licensed under a The Open Government Licence (OGL).
High Speed Two Ltd.
2 Snowhill
Queensway
Birmingham
B4 6GA
United Kingdom
Tel: 08081 434 434
This collection comprises site data (digital photographs, reports, scanned trench and context sheets, registers and drawings) from a trial trench evaluation by INFRA Archaeology on land at Kings Pond Cottage, near Great Missenden, Buckinghamshire. The evaluation, comprising 19 trenches, was undertaken during February 2019.
The evaluation forms part of Phase One of the High Speed 2 (HS2) rail project, which will involve the construction of a new railway approximately 230km (143 miles) in length between London and the West Midlands. Powers for the construction, operation and maintenance of Phase One are conferred by the High-Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Act 2017.
The aims of the trial trenching were to:
The evaluation also contributed to the delivery of the following GWSI: HERDS Specific Objectives:
Of the 19 trenches excavated, 7 contained archaeological features, including 2 pits and 8 linear features interpreted as field boundaries and drainage ditches. The results of the evaluation identified agricultural exploitation, likely removed from a settlement. Only one feature was able to be dated with any certainty, a field boundary ditch from the late 13th to early 15th century.
Further work on the site is recommended as it could clarify the extent of the linear features and pits identified during this evaluation, and hopefully provide further dating evidence for these features. This could take the form of a small-scale open-area excavation targeted on the area south of centre where the evaluation detected a slightly increased concentration of features. Any further work, or other archaeological interventions in the immediate area, would benefit from the results and data provided by this archive.
The results of the evaluation on land at Kings Pond Cottage identified agricultural exploitation, likely removed from a settlement. Only one feature was able to be dated with any certainty, a field boundary ditch from the late 13th to early 15th century.
Further work on Site is recommended as it could clarify the extent of the linear features and pits identified during this evaluation, and hopefully provide further dating evidence for these features. This could take the form of a small-scale open-area excavation targeted on the area south of centre where the evaluation detected a slightly increased concentration of features. Any further work, or other archaeological interventions in the immediate area, would benefit from the results and data provided by this archive.