n.a. (2003). 1 Summary. In: n.e. Resistivity imaging survey of Capo Long Barrow, Aberdeenshire. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland. p. 1.
Title The title of the publication or report |
1 Summary | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Resistivity imaging survey of Capo Long Barrow, Aberdeenshire | ||||||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Scottish Archaeological Internet Reports | ||||||
Volume Volume number and part |
6 | ||||||
Number of Pages The number of pages in the publication or report |
21 | ||||||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
1 | ||||||
Downloads Any files associated with the publication or report that can be downloaded from the ADS |
|
||||||
Licence Type ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC. |
ADS Terms of Use and Access
|
||||||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
MonographSeriesChapter | ||||||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
Non-invasive fieldwork carried out on the Neolithic long barrow at Capo, present-day Aberdeenshire (NGR NO 633 664) has considerably enhanced our knowledge of this monument. Topographical survey has provided the first detailed record of the barrow and its environs. Resistivity imaging has revealed key elements of the structure of the long barrow, including side revetment walls, a flat facade and possible mortuary structures, confirming that the barrow at Capo is of a similar morphology to the nearby (excavated) long barrow at Dalladies. The resistivity survey has demonstrated that rabbit burrowing and the roots of the tree stumps that covered the barrow have had little effect on the integrity of the major structural elements of the monument (the revetments and facade). However, it is not possible to assess the more subtle damage, such as mixing of archaeological layers, which may have been caused. It is concluded that, whilst resistivity imaging at the survey density employed here is time-consuming and would not be appropriate at many sites, as a management tool and as a means to explore sites that are unavailable for excavation, such as scheduled ancient monuments, it has been demonstrated to be of considerable value. | ||||||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2003 | ||||||
ISBN International Standard Book Number |
0-903903-75-X | ||||||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
||||||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(DigitalBorn)
|
||||||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
03 Nov 2015 |