Cunliffe, B., Harding, A. F. and Austin, D. (1996). The 1996 Research Assessment Exercise in British universities: views from the judging and the judged. Antiquity 70 (268). Vol 70(268), pp. 250-255.
 Title The title of the publication or report |
The 1996 Research Assessment Exercise in British universities: views from the judging and the judged |
|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Antiquity 70 (268) |
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Antiquity |
Volume Volume number and part |
70 (268) |
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
250 - 255 |
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
Please note that this is a bibliographic record only, as originally entered into the BIAB database. The ADS have no files for download, and unfortunately cannot advise further on where to access hard copy or digital versions. |
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal |
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
Presents three perspectives on the RAE. Firstly, a reprint of the Society of Antiquaries of London's 1995 Presidential Anniversary Address `The benefits of assessment, and some risks' by Barry Cunliffe (251) where, despite warnings against allowing market forces to predominate, the galvanising effects the Exercise has had on the publication and research structure are welcomed. `Democracy and peer assessment' by Anthony Harding (252--3) considers the way in which RAE assessors come to be selected, whilst `Reflections of an assessor' by David Austin (253--5) provides a critique of the RAE comparing it to the Welsh Teaching Quality Assessment. |
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
1996 |
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(The British & Irish Archaeological Bibliography (BIAB))
|
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
20 Jan 2002 |
