Biddle, M. (1989). The Rose reviewed: a comedy (?) of errors. Antiquity 63. Vol 63, pp. 753-760.
 Title The title of the publication or report |
The Rose reviewed: a comedy (?) of errors | |
|---|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Antiquity 63 | |
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Antiquity | |
Volume Volume number and part |
63 | |
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
753 - 760 | |
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
Please note that this is a bibliographic record only, as originally entered into the BIAB database. The ADS have no files for download, and unfortunately cannot advise further on where to access hard copy or digital versions. | |
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | |
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
In May 1989 the only surviving Shakespearian theatre, the Rose, was located and partly excavated, became the subject of actors' vigils to stop its destruction through redevelopment, and was briefly reprieved, only to receive a different excavation team and be covered in for 'preservation' and later display. The whole affair was bad for developers and archaeology alike, and three lessons are drawn: our profession must resolve the debate on excavation versus preservation; English Heritage needs a more open and responsive style of operation; and the position of archaeology in the planning process must be guaranteed. (See also Antiquity editorial, 63, 1989, 411-13.) | |
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
1989 | |
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
|
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(British Archaeological Abstracts (BAA))
|
|
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
05 Dec 2008 |
