Parker Pearson, M. (1993). The powerful dead: archaeological relationships between the living and the dead. Cambridge Archaeol J 3 (2). Vol 3(2), pp. 203-229.
Title The title of the publication or report |
The powerful dead: archaeological relationships between the living and the dead | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Cambridge Archaeol J 3 (2) | |||||||||||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Cambridge Archaeological Journal | |||||||||||
Volume Volume number and part |
3 (2) | |||||||||||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
203 - 229 | |||||||||||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
Please note that this is a bibliographic record only, as originally entered into the BIAB database. The ADS have no files for download, and unfortunately cannot advise further on where to access hard copy or digital versions. | |||||||||||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | |||||||||||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
An anaylsis of how archaeologists might recover ideological changes associated with the treatment and view of the dead which has repercussions for their interpretation of social organisation and social change. Interpretations of status, gender and ranking from funerary deposits are to a large extent dependent on archaeologists' abilities to interpret initially the relationship that the living construct with the dead. This contextual analysis of the Danish Iron Age uses studies of landscape and topography, and contrasts in material culture, to situate the changing placement of the dead within society. Their increasing incorporation into the world of the living in the pre-Roman Iron Age indicates a growing concern with lineage and individual status. Later on, within the hierarchical ordering of Roman Iron Age society, the dead retained their significance for the living but in certain regions this was expressed in terms of their community rather than status differences. | |||||||||||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
1993 | |||||||||||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
|||||||||||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(The British Archaeological Bibliography (BAB))
|
|||||||||||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
20 Jan 2002 |