Ransley, J. (2007). Rigorous reasoning, reflexive research and the space for `alternative archaeologies'. Questions for maritime archaeological heritage management. Internat J Naut Archaeol 36 (2). Vol 36(2), pp. 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-9270.2007.00148.x.
 Title The title of the publication or report |
Rigorous reasoning, reflexive research and the space for `alternative archaeologies'. Questions for maritime archaeological heritage management | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Internat J Naut Archaeol 36 (2) | ||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
International Journal of Nautical Archaeology | ||
Volume Volume number and part |
36 (2) | ||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
221 - 237 | ||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability. | ||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | ||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
As England's heritage policy is shaped, the author calls for debate, and some consensus, among the maritime archaeological community on core management questions. These include approaches to degrading underwater sites, how to deal with shipwrecks threatened by development, and crucially, who should be driving these decisions. The paper argues that there is a need for self-critical analysis of the meaning of `heritage'. It problematises the notion of professional archaeologists as `guardians of the archaeological record' and the conception of `heritage' formed without reference to ideas of the past being a product of the present and, therefore, the potential for the production of multiple pasts. | ||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2007 | ||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(The British & Irish Archaeological Bibliography (BIAB))
|
||
Relations Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report |
|
||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
24 Sep 2007 |
