Carr, G. (2005). Woad, tattooing and identity in Later Iron Age and early Roman Britain. Oxford J Archaeol 24 (3). Vol 24(3), pp. 273-292.
Title The title of the publication or report |
Woad, tattooing and identity in Later Iron Age and early Roman Britain | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Oxford J Archaeol 24 (3) | ||||||||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Oxford Journal of Archaeology | ||||||||
Volume Volume number and part |
24 (3) | ||||||||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
273 - 292 | ||||||||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability. | ||||||||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | ||||||||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
The paper explores the archaeological evidence for the practice of facial and corporeal dyeing, painting and tattooing in the Later Iron Age and early Roman period. The aim is to construct a hypothesis which explains how, why, when and by whom such pigments were worn. Although this hypothesis discusses woad-derived indigo, this is used mainly, although not exclusively, as an experimental tool, as no conclusive archaeological evidence exists which reveals the identity of the `real' pigment(s). Woad has also long held a place in the popular imagination as the source of the dye which the ancient Britons used to paint themselves. The paper explores the possibility that the cosmetic grinder was the focal artefact used in body painting or tattooing, and was used for grinding and mixing body and face paint. It is suggested that, rather than being a Roman-style tool for cosmetic application from the start, it may have begun life as an artefact first used by the Later Iron Age Britons for body painting and expressing indigenous identities. Includes | ||||||||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2005 | ||||||||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
||||||||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(The British & Irish Archaeological Bibliography (BIAB))
|
||||||||
Relations Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report |
|
||||||||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
21 Apr 2006 |