Talamo, S. and Richards, M. P. (2011). A comparison of bone pretreatment methods for AMS dating of samples >30,000 BP. Radiocarbon 53 (3). Vol 53(3), pp. 443-449.
 Title The title of the publication or report |
A comparison of bone pretreatment methods for AMS dating of samples >30,000 BP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Radiocarbon 53 (3) | |||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Radiocarbon | |||
Volume Volume number and part |
53 (3) | |||
Number of Pages The number of pages in the publication or report |
139 | |||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
443 - 449 | |||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability. | |||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | |||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
Bone is a commonly used material for radiocarbon dating, yet at ages close to the limit of the method (>30,000 BP), it is a substantial challenge to remove contamination and produce accurate ages. Reports here on the preliminary results of a dating study of 2 bones older than 30,000 yr, which were each treated with a suite of pretreatment procedures, including ultrafiltration (Brown et al. 1988). Substantial differences in the 14C ages were observed, which is most likely linked to crucial steps in the removal of contamination both in the bone and in the laboratory. Using a comprehensive sequence of pretreatment procedures, including ultrafiltration, older ages are generally obtained. | |||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2011 | |||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
|||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(biab_online)
|
|||
Relations Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report |
|
|||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
23 Feb 2013 |
