Brock, F., Wood, R., Higham, T. F G., Ditchfield, P., Bayliss, A. and Bronk-Ramsey, C. (2012). Reliability of Nitrogen content (%N) and Carbon:Nitrogen atomic ratios (C:N) as indicators of collagen preservation suitable for radiocarbon dating. Proceedings of the Sixth Radiocarbon and Archaeology Symposium, held in Paphos, Cyprus, 10'“15 April 2011.. Vol 54(3-4), pp. 879-886. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_js_rc.v54i3'“4.16144.

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
Reliability of Nitrogen content (%N) and Carbon:Nitrogen atomic ratios (C:N) as indicators of collagen preservation suitable for radiocarbon dating
Issue
Issue
The name of the volume or issue
Issue:
Proceedings of the Sixth Radiocarbon and Archaeology Symposium, held in Paphos, Cyprus, 10'“15 April 2011.
Series
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
Radiocarbon
Volume
Volume
Volume number and part
Volume:
54 (3-4)
Number of Pages
Number of Pages
The number of pages in the publication or report
Number of Pages:
809
Page Start/End
Page Start/End
The start and end page numbers.
Page Start/End:
879 - 886
Biblio Note
Biblio Note
This is a Bibliographic record only.
Biblio Note
The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability.
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Journal
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:
A recent study into prescreening techniques to identify bones suitable for radiocarbon dating from sites known for poor or variable preservation (Brock et al. 2007, 2010a) found that the percent nitrogen (%N) content of whole bone powder was the most reliable indicator of collagen preservation. Measurement of %N is rapid, requires little preparation or material, and is relatively cheap. The technique reduces the risk of needlessly sampling valuable archaeological objects, as well as saving time and money on their unsuccessful pretreatment prior to dating. This method of prescreening is now regularly used at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). In the original study, linear regression analysis of data from 100 bones from 12 Holocene sites across southern England showed that when 0.76% N was chosen as a threshold, 84% of bones were successfully identified as containing sufficient (i.e. >1%) or insufficient (i.e. <1%) collagen for dating. However, it has been observed that for older, Pleistocene bones the failure rate may be higher, possibly due to the presence of more degraded, short-chain proteins that pass through the ultrafilters used in pretreatment, resulting in lower yields. Here, linear regression analysis of data from nearly 600 human and animal bones, antlers, and teeth, from a wide range of contexts and ages, is presented to determine whether the 0.76% threshold identified in the previous study is still applicable. The potential of carbon:nitrogen atomic weight ratios (C:N) of whole bone to predict collagen preservation is also discussed.
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:
Fiona Brock
Rachel Wood
Thomas F G Higham
Peter Ditchfield
Alex Bayliss ORCID icon
Christopher Bronk-Ramsey ORCID icon
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2012
Locations
Locations
Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published.
Subjects / Periods:
Pleistocene (Auto Detected Temporal)
Radiocarbon Dating (Auto Detected Subject)
Teeth (Auto Detected Subject)
Holocene (Auto Detected Temporal)
Bone (Auto Detected Subject)
Animal Bones Antlers (Auto Detected Subject)
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
BIAB (biab_online)
Relations
Relations
Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report
Relations:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_js_rc.v54i3'“4.16144
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
24 Feb 2013