Hillam, J. and Tyers, I. (1995). Reliability and repeatability in dendrochronological analysis: tests using the Fletcher archive of panel-painting data. Archaeometry 37 (2). Vol 37(2), pp. 395-405.
 Title The title of the publication or report |
Reliability and repeatability in dendrochronological analysis: tests using the Fletcher archive of panel-painting data | |
|---|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Archaeometry 37 (2) | |
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Archaeometry | |
Volume Volume number and part |
37 (2) | |
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
395 - 405 | |
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
Please note that this is a bibliographic record only, as originally entered into the BIAB database. The ADS have no files for download, and unfortunately cannot advise further on where to access hard copy or digital versions. | |
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | |
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
Research into the dates of timber used for art-historical objects has provided a large data set on which to test standard dendrochronological techniques. Some 177 sets of tree-ring measurements, originally analysed by the late Dr J M Fletcher at Oxford University, have been re-examined independently in the tree-ring laboratories at the University of Sheffield and the Museum of London Archaeology Service. The results show a high level of agreement between laboratories. In contrast, many of the dates produced by Fletcher are not confirmed. The two different approaches described here also resulted in remarkably similar internal groupings of the dated material. These groupings probably reflect the provenance of the timbers and suggest that two different areas of the eastern Baltic supplied the bulk of material, with smaller quantities of panels originating in Britain and Central Europe. | |
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
1995 | |
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
|
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(The British Archaeological Bibliography (BAB))
|
|
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
20 Jan 2002 |
