Vandorpe, P. and Jacomet, S. (2007). Comparing different pre-treatment methods for strongly compacted organic sediments prior to wet-sieving. Environ Archaeol 12 (2). Vol 12(2), pp. 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1179/174963107x226462.

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
Comparing different pre-treatment methods for strongly compacted organic sediments prior to wet-sieving
Subtitle
Subtitle
The sub title of the publication or report
Subtitle:
a case study on Roman waterlogged deposits
Issue
Issue
The name of the volume or issue
Issue:
Environ Archaeol 12 (2)
Series
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
Circaea
Volume
Volume
Volume number and part
Volume:
12 (2)
Page Start/End
Page Start/End
The start and end page numbers.
Page Start/End:
207 - 214
Biblio Note
Biblio Note
This is a Bibliographic record only.
Biblio Note
The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability.
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Journal
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:
Four pre-treatment methods were tested on strongly compacted organic sediments prior to sieving. They comprise heating, freezing, soaking in NaHCO3 (sodium bicarbonate) and heating with 10% KOH (potassium hydroxide). The aim of the experiment was to find out which pre-treatment method facilitates the sieving process without destroying the waterlogged plant remains recovered. Several methods are already described in the literature, but only few systematic comparisons of pre-treatment methods were undertaken. Of the four techniques tested, freezing the samples prior to sieving came out as the best option; it eases sieving and has the least damaging impact on the waterlogged plant remains. In addition, it is fast, uncomplicated and does not leave any chemical waste.
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:
Patrice Vandorpe
Stefanie Jacomet
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2007
Locations
Locations
Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published.
Subjects / Periods:
Chemical Waste (Auto Detected Subject)
Waterlogged Plant Remains (Auto Detected Subject)
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
BIAB (The British & Irish Archaeological Bibliography (BIAB))
Relations
Relations
Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report
Relations:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/174963107x226462
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
20 Aug 2008