Cooper, N. J. (2002). Display, status and the vernacular tradition. Vernacular Architect 33. Vol 33, pp. 28-33.
Title The title of the publication or report |
Display, status and the vernacular tradition | |
---|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Vernacular Architect 33 | |
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Vernacular Architecture | |
Volume Volume number and part |
33 | |
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
28 - 33 | |
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
Please note that this is a bibliographic record only, as originally entered into the BIAB database. The ADS have no files for download, and unfortunately cannot advise further on where to access hard copy or digital versions. | |
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | |
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
It is argued that the transformation of vernacular architecture in the seventeenth century may in part be explained by a changing view of how the house should express the standing of its owner. The sixteenth century had seen the introduction of renaissance architectural detail as a symbol of education, status and power. In the seventeenth century, a more complete architectural language was developed at a high social level, embracing the overall form of the house. It is argued that the loss of local vernacular traditions may have been due to a simultaneous weakening of old structures of deference and authority, making possible the spread of the new style by freeing it of its status associations, and that by the eighteenth century, vernacular building had come to consist of a number of regional variations on a national style, and associations with status had been replaced by concern for stylistic correctness. | |
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2002 | |
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
|
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(The British & Irish Archaeological Bibliography (BIAB))
|
|
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
13 Jun 2005 |