Chatwin, D. and Gardiner, M. F. (2005). Rethinking the early medieval settlement of woodlands:. Landscape Hist 27. Vol 27, pp. 31-49.
 Title The title of the publication or report |
Rethinking the early medieval settlement of woodlands: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Subtitle The sub title of the publication or report |
evidence from the western Sussex Weald | |||
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Landscape Hist 27 | |||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Landscape History | |||
Volume Volume number and part |
27 | |||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
31 - 49 | |||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
Please note that this is a bibliographic record only, as originally entered into the BIAB database. The ADS have no files for download, and unfortunately cannot advise further on where to access hard copy or digital versions. | |||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | |||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
The assumptions underlying the interpretation of the early medieval settlement of woodland are challenged through a detailed study of the Weald in western Sussex. The patterns of usage of woodland in England were very varied, and it is argued that each area needs to be looked at individually; that systems of woodland exploitation did not simply develop from extensive to intensive, but may have taken a number of different forms during the early medieval period. In one area of the Weald, near Horsham, the woodland appears to have been systematically divided up between different estates. This implies that woodland settlement may not always have developed organically, but that this type of landscape could have been planned. It is argued that the historical complexity of woodland landscapes has not been recognised because the evidence has been aggregated. | |||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2005 | |||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
|||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(The British & Irish Archaeological Bibliography (BIAB))
|
|||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
19 Dec 2006 |
