White, M. J. (2000). The Clactonian question:. J World Prehist 14 (1). Vol 14(1), pp. 1-63.
 Title The title of the publication or report |
The Clactonian question: | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Subtitle The sub title of the publication or report |
on the interpretation of core-and-flake assemblages in the British Lower Paleolithic | ||
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
J World Prehist 14 (1) | ||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Journal of World Prehistory | ||
Volume Volume number and part |
14 (1) | ||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
1 - 63 | ||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability. | ||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | ||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
The nature, significance, and validity of the British core-and-flake assemblage known as the Clactonian have recently come under scrutiny, with the view of the Clactonian as the product of a distinct, non-handaxe-making technical tradition being challenged by notions of a single European knapping repertoire in which the proportion of handaxes varies according to factors such as activity facies, local raw material potential, and landscape use. Furthermore, recent technological studies which show a basic technological parity between the Acheulean and the Clactonian have been argued as eroding the rationale for seeing the Clactonian as a separate entity. The paper reviews the empirical basis and interpretation of the Clactonian, in both recent years and the recent past. | ||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2000 | ||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(The British & Irish Archaeological Bibliography (BIAB))
|
||
Relations Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report |
|
||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
14 Feb 2005 |
