Rennell, R. (2012). Landscape, experience and GIS. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 19 (4). Vol 19(4), pp. 510-525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-012-9144-5.
 Title The title of the publication or report |
Landscape, experience and GIS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Subtitle The sub title of the publication or report |
exploring the potential for methodological dialogue | ||
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 19 (4) | ||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory | ||
Volume Volume number and part |
19 (4) | ||
Number of Pages The number of pages in the publication or report |
121 | ||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
510 - 525 | ||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability. | ||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | ||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
Over the last 15 years, an interest in perceptions and experiences of landscape has emerged as in important area of archaeological research. Experiential landscape archae- ology ultimately owes its background to the concerns raised as part of the post- processual critique, as well as a range of phenomenological philosophies and social theories emphasising the importance of human experience in our understanding of the past. Current archaeological practice provides two contrasting methods for investigating this type of landscape experience. One approach is rooted in the analysis of subject- centred field observations, inspired more directly by phenomenological arguments or positions. The other has emerged out of the application of Geographical Information Systems (hereafter GIS) and the increasing ability of this technology (or practitioners of this technology more specifically) to model human scales of geographical space and elements of human experience. Despite a number of shared objectives, there remains very little productive discourse between the respective advocates of these positions. Attempts to communicate across this perceived boundary. | ||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2012 | ||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(biab_online)
|
||
Relations Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report |
|
||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
31 Mar 2013 |
