Gale, J. (2002). Are we perceived to be what we say we are?. In: n.e. Digging holes in popular culture:. Oxford: Oxbow Books. pp. 1-7.
Title The title of the publication or report |
Are we perceived to be what we say we are? |
---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Digging holes in popular culture: |
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Bournemouth University School of Conservation Sciences Occasional Papers |
Volume Volume number and part |
7 |
Number of Pages The number of pages in the publication or report |
174 |
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
1 - 7 |
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
Please note that this is a bibliographic record only, as originally entered into the BIAB database. The ADS have no files for download, and unfortunately cannot advise further on where to access hard copy or digital versions. |
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
MonographSeriesChapter |
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
which considers that science fiction authors and screenplay writers reflect their own perceptions of archaeology by tending to emphasise the exciting discovery of ancient and alien cultures through their material remains, while archaeologists are depicted as serious and single-minded, even mysterious, `quasi-scientists'. Yet, though archaeologists' perceptions of what they do may vary widely, they need to avoid issuing publications than tend to be dull and over-cautious |
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2002 |
ISBN International Standard Book Number |
1-84217-063-5 |
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(The British & Irish Archaeological Bibliography (BIAB))
|
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
04 Nov 2002 |