Piggott, S. (1967). "Unchambered" long barrows in Neolithic Britain. Palaeohistoria 12. Vol 12, pp. 381-393.
Title The title of the publication or report |
"Unchambered" long barrows in Neolithic Britain | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Palaeohistoria 12 | |||||||||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Palaeohistoria | |||||||||
Volume Volume number and part |
12 | |||||||||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
381 - 393 | |||||||||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
Please note that this is a bibliographic record only, as originally entered into the BIAB database. The ADS have no files for download, and unfortunately cannot advise further on where to access hard copy or digital versions. | |||||||||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | |||||||||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
These barrows continue to present many unsolved problems. Within the British Isles they are linked with certain chambered tomb groups by such features as their trapezoid plan, occasional curved façades and terminal burial areas; with all chambered tombs by the shared rite of collective and successive burial. Chronological separation cannot at present be made, but presumptive evidence (and direct stratigraphy at Waylands Smithy) would place them earlier than the British tombs of, for instance, the Severn-Cotswold group, to which they would have contributed the trapezoid mound element to be combined with the W French traditions implicit in the transepted burial chambers. The trapezoid house and mortuary enclosure have a long history on the N European plain, but in its funeral expression the tradition cannot be shown to antedate British examples such as Fussell's Lodge. Its presence as far west as the Saale brings it within reasonable geographical proximity to Britain, but the divergent burial rites in the two areas remain obstacles to direct relationships, even if details such as fore-buildings, burnt or unburnt, appear to offer more specific links. Au | |||||||||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
1967 | |||||||||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
|||||||||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(British Archaeological Abstracts (BAA))
|
|||||||||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
05 Dec 2008 |