Gransard-Desmond, J. (2013). Can we really differentiate between treasure hunters and non-professional archaeologists?. Internet Archaeology 33: Portable Antiquities: archaeology, collecting, metal detecting. Vol 33, https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.33.2.

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
Can we really differentiate between treasure hunters and non-professional archaeologists?
Issue
Issue
The name of the volume or issue
Issue:
Internet Archaeology 33: Portable Antiquities: archaeology, collecting, metal detecting
Series
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
Internet Archaeology
Volume
Volume
Volume number and part
Volume:
33
Biblio Note
Biblio Note
This is a Bibliographic record only.
Biblio Note
The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability.
Licence Type
Licence Type
ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC.
Licence Type:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International Licence icon
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
International Licence
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Journal
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:
Since February 2010, the issue of Users of Metal Detectors (UMDs) has been a hot topic in France. If the issue unleashed passions, although this has not really been reflected in the French media, a question is implicitly linked to the subject: apart from preventing the very real danger of new archaeological sites being destroyed, will this spell the end of amateur archaeology? With the creation of the National Archaeological Excavations Association (INRAP) in 1973, which became a public service called the National Institute for Preventative Archaeological Research in 2002, coupled with the growth of private companies in archaeology, the professionalisation of French archaeology has significantly changed the relationship between this profession and amateur archaeologists. This evolution now underlines the ambiguous position of the French state, which, on the one hand, supports the contributions of civil society to the profession, yet on the other hand, is still very suspicious about organisations that are not directly dependent upon the state. After a quick review of relevant legislation and the evolution of French archaeology, we will present a profile of the UMDs, their impact on archaeology and the reactions to this subject by professionals as well as the state, communities and citizens. Then, we will broaden the issue by asking if UMDs represent the only human danger for archaeology. Finally, we will discuss potential solutions to the problem of looting while still encouraging the involvement and recognition of amateur archaeologists and citizens committed to the protection of French heritage.
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:
Jean-Olivier Gransard-Desmond
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2013
Locations
Locations
Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published.
Subjects / Periods:
METAL DETECTING USE (Event)
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
ADS Library (ADS Library)
Relations
Relations
Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report
Relations:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.33.2
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
26 Mar 2019