Osborne, J., Shipley, L. and Perry, S. (2014). Digital Media, Power and (In)Equality in Archaeology and Heritage . Internet Archaeology 38. Vol 38, https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.38.4.

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
Digital Media, Power and (In)Equality in Archaeology and Heritage
Issue
Issue
The name of the volume or issue
Issue:
Internet Archaeology 38
Series
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
Internet Archaeology
Volume
Volume
Volume number and part
Volume:
38
Biblio Note
Biblio Note
This is a Bibliographic record only.
Biblio Note
The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability.
Licence Type
Licence Type
ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC.
Licence Type:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International Licence icon
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
International Licence
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Journal
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:
Decades of Internet study have arguably done little to shed light on the nature and implications of web-based communications in archaeology. Since the late 1990s, the online world has been lauded by archaeologists for its capacities to engender dialogue, participation, intellectual change and even democratic revolution. Yet the dangers associated with its use have barely been probed. Threats to privacy, equality, access, security of data, and personal safety and well-being are seemingly characteristic of all communication technologies. However, the naive zeal with which many archaeological and heritage organisations are employing online platforms for dissemination, profile-building, 'impact' and public accountability is fraught with risk and deserving of interrogation.This article explores the effects of digital culture on the professional identities and careers of archaeologists, heritage specialists and museum workers. Through a multi-disciplinary survey of over 400 individuals, nearly one-third of whom self-identified as archaeological or related heritage practitioners (working both inside and outside of the academic sector), we consider the various ways in which online technologies are used to express, promote, facilitate, strengthen and undermine both professionals themselves and professional practices in archaeology. Situating ourselves in the intersectional and feminist literature, we argue that web-based harassment and lack of adequate e-safety mechanisms are rife in the discipline, putting it in jeopardy of fuelling structural inequalities. Our findings suggest that close to one-third of practitioners report victimisation via online communication; the majority know their abusers offline; and, although the prevalence of such abuse is roughly equal among men and women, its nature is split along gender lines. Of especial concern, most practitioners choose to ignore their abuse, a decision that may be motivated by the non-existent or victim-harming institutional e-policies rampant in the sector. We call, then, for archaeology and heritage organisations - and their funders - to recognise their incontrovertible duty of care to staff, volunteers, students and communities engaged with their online platforms. As chronicled here, the meaningful public impact, access and empowerment sought by the profession via the social web are not achievable without investment in robust protection and prevention measures.
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:
Jim Osborne
Lucy Shipley
Sara Perry
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2014
Locations
Locations
Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published.
Subjects / Periods:
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (Object England)
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
ADS Library (ADS Library)
Relations
Relations
Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report
Relations:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.38.4
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
28 Mar 2019