Karl, R., Griffiths, S., Edwards, B., Wilson, A., Labrosse, F., Miles, H., Moeller, K., Roberts, J. and Tiddeman, B. (2015). Crowd-sourcing archaeological research: HeritageTogether digital public archaeology in practice. Internet Archaeology 40. Vol 40, https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.40.7.3.
Title The title of the publication or report |
Crowd-sourcing archaeological research: HeritageTogether digital public archaeology in practice | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Internet Archaeology 40 | ||||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Internet Archaeology | ||||
Volume Volume number and part |
40 | ||||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability. | ||||
Licence Type ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC. |
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
International Licence |
||||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | ||||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
Archaeologists are increasingly working with crowd-sourced digital data. Using evidence from other disciplines about the nature of crowd-sourcing in academic research, we suggest that archaeological projects using donated data can usefully be differentiated between generative projects (which rely on data collected by citizen scientists), and analytical projects (which make use of volunteers to classify, or otherwise analyse data that are provided by the project). We conclude that projects which privilege hyper-local research (such as surveying specific sites) might experience tension if the audience they are appealing to are 'cyber local'. In turn, for more 'traditional' archaeological audiences (when the primary motivating interests may be the tangible, physical nature of portable material culture or the archaeological site itself), then intangible, digital simulacra may not provide an effective medium through which to undertake digital public archaeology. | ||||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2015 | ||||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
||||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
||||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
ADS Library
(ADS Library)
|
||||
Relations Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report |
|
||||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
28 Mar 2019 |