skip to navigation
ADS Main Website
Help
|
Login
/
Browse by Series
/
Series
/ Journal Issue
Oxford J Archaeol 10 (2)
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
Oxford J Archaeol 10 (2)
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
Oxford Journal of Archaeology
Volume
Volume number and part
Volume:
10 (2)
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Journal
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
1991
Note
Extra information on the publication or report.
Note:
Date Of Issue From: 1991
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
BIAB (The British Archaeological Bibliography (BAB))
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
20 Jan 2002
Please click on an Article link to go to the Article Details.
Article Title
Access Type
Author / Editor
Page
Start/End
Abstract
Images de la chasse au Paléolithique
Jean-Pierre Duhard
127 - 157
Palaeolithic figurative art depicting hunting provides evidence which suggests a social and sexual dichotomy in the Magdalenian period.
The trade of Indo-Pacific shells into the Mediterranean basin and Europe
David S Reese
159 - 196
Documents sites where shells from the Indo-Pacific marine province have been recorded as found, ranging in date from the Upper Palaeolithic to recent times. Sixteen of these sites were found to have been incorrectly identified. The majority were found in graves and sanctuary sites, although it is suggested that it is easier to write on the where of trading patterns than the why. Includes some finds from southern England.
The potential mobility of human populations
Robin Osborne
231 - 252
Documentary evidence from Clayworth and Cogenhoe is included in a paper that considers how demographic change through migration might ultimately be recoverable from the archaeological record.
Portchester revisited
Richard Reece
253 - 260
The original ideas (see 76/3674) are reviewed and with the help of critiques from Casey (see 86/1256) and Brickstock (see 88/532) a new method of presentation is put forward. Conclusions in the original report relating to periods of occupation/cleanliness as opposed to desertion/squalor were based not only on coin evidence but general stratigraphy. Criticisms on the over general nature of the statistical analysis are incorporated, but the conclusions remain the same.
