Hewson, M. (2021). Smithfield Market Development, Birmingham: Archaeological Evaluation and Watching Brief. Cirencester: Cotswold Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.5284/1093879. Cite this using datacite

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
Smithfield Market Development, Birmingham: Archaeological Evaluation and Watching Brief
Series
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
Cotswold Archaeology unpublished report series
Downloads
Downloads
Any files associated with the publication or report that can be downloaded from the ADS
Downloads:
cotswold2-502856_182707.pdf (10 MB) : Download
Licence Type
Licence Type
ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC.
Licence Type:
ADS Terms of Use and Access icon
ADS Terms of Use and Access
DOI
DOI
The DOI (digital object identifier) for the publication or report.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5284/1093879
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Report (in Series)
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:
The evaluation comprised the excavation of three trenches: • Trench 1 measured 11m in length by 2.2m in width and was aligned approximately north-east/south-west. This sought to identify evidence of the former stone structure recorded in 1975 and its relationship to the moat platform and the edge of the moat. It also sought to identify the extent and depth of the moat on its south-western side. The intention was to excavate the trench between the foundation bases of the former market building, and with that in mind its original position was very slightly amended to better align with the space between concrete foundation bases and associated ring beams. • Trench 2 measured 25m in length by 2.2m in width and was aligned broadly north/south. This sought to evaluate the potential survival of the former moat platform within the western arm of the moat. • Trench 3 measured 40m in length by 2.2m in width and was aligned broadly north/south. This trench sought to understand the extent of the moat on its south-western side and its relationship with the interior of the moat platform. Two contingency trench options were also provided within the scope of the WSI, as Trench 4 Option A and Trench 4 Option B. The intention, initially, was to open Trenches 1 – 3 in order to define the depth, extent, state of preservation and date of buried archaeological remains and then, if required, to excavate Trench 4 in either of the two locations defined in the WSI to enhance the results of the excavation of those trenches. Following consultation with the PCOBCC and the Client, the implementation of this contingency was not required. Each of the trenches exceeded 1m in depth in places, though not for their entire lengths. The depth of each trench was initially established when the first archaeological horizon or natural substrate was revealed (whichever was encountered first). Where the trenches were excavated to depths greater than 1m (and less where necessary) and safe access could not be guaranteed, recording of archaeological remains took place from ‘trench-side’ only. The excavation methodology was agreed on Site with the PCOBCC once the nature of the subsurface deposits was confirmed. The watching brief comprised the observation by a competent archaeologist of intrusive groundworks. The monitored groundworks comprised the hand excavated of a small (1m long by 0.5m wide) geotechnical test pit and the machine excavation of footprint of a proposed lift (measuring 8m long by 6m wide). In December 2020 and January 2021 Cotswold Archaeology carried out an archaeological evaluation at the former Wholesale Market site, off Pershore Street in Birmingham. This was undertaken as part of the Smithfield Market Development. Three trenches were excavated, targeted on the site of the former medieval manor house and associated structures, along with the moat that surrounded these buildings. These remains represent the focus of settlement in early Birmingham. A watching brief was also undertaken during the excavation of a lift pit at the Site. The evaluation demonstrated that structural elements of the medieval moated manor survive substantially intact at no more than 0.5m beneath the present concrete slab. Deposits of medieval date were also identified at the base of the moat. This suggests that in situ deposits, artefacts and palaeoenvironmental evidence survive well, where not cut by groundworks in the 1970s. Post-medieval to 19th century structural remains were recorded within the former area of the moat platform, as well as to the southern edge of the former moat and to its north.
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:
Mark Hewson
Publisher
Publisher
The publisher of the publication or report
Publisher:
Cotswold Archaeology
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2021
Locations
Locations
Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published.
Locations:
County: West Midlands
District: Birmingham
Country: England
Parish: Birmingham, unparished area
Grid Reference: 407390, 286432 (Easting, Northing)
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods associated with this record.
Subjects / Periods:
EVALUATION (Event)
WATCHING BRIEF (Event)
MOAT (Monument Type England)
MEDIEVAL MOAT (Tag)
MANOR HOUSE (Monument Type England)
MEDIEVAL MANOR HOUSE (Tag)
MEDIEVAL (Historic England Periods)
Identifiers
Identifiers
Identifiers associated with the publication. These might include DOIs, site codes, Monument Identifiers etc.
Identifiers:
OASIS Id: cotswold2-502856
Report id: MK0351_1
Note
Note
Extra information on the publication or report.
Note:
This report was uploaded to the OASIS system by the named Publisher. The report has been transferred into the ADS Library for public access and to facilitate future research.
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
OASIS (OASIS)
Relations
Relations
Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report
Relations:
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
07 Jun 2022