Smart, R. (2022). Evaluation at Shepherd Grove, Stanton, Suffolk. Cotswold Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.5284/1098599. Cite this using datacite

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
Evaluation at Shepherd Grove, Stanton, Suffolk
Series
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
Cotswold Archaeology unpublished report series
Downloads
Downloads
Any files associated with the publication or report that can be downloaded from the ADS
Downloads:
cotswold2-503296_186157.pdf (7 MB) : Download
Licence Type
Licence Type
ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC.
Licence Type:
ADS Terms of Use and Access icon
ADS Terms of Use and Access
DOI
DOI
The DOI (digital object identifier) for the publication or report.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5284/1098599
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Report (in Series)
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:
An evaluation of 99 trenches ranging in length from 10-30m x 1.8m In November 2021, Cotswold Archaeology Suffolk carried out an archaeological evaluation of land at Shepherds Grove, Stanton, Suffolk. The evaluation comprised of 106 trenches, but due to the high level of disturbance identified across the southern area of the site from the construction and subsequent demolition of the airfield only ninety-nine trenches were opened. Archaeological remains were identified in eight of the trenches, finds recovered across the site were generally low, with most features devoid of datable material. Prehistory was represented by a probable burnt mound feature identified in Trench 2, with four associated pits which also appear in Trench 3. The post-medieval activity identified on site was a ditch creating an enclosure which was identified in trenches 24, 26 and 29 which appears to have been in use very recently. The final three identified features were undated pits which appeared to survive within small pockets of preservation in the southern area of the site. Due to the previous activity on the site the majority of the site was severally impacted with very little of the archaeological horizon intact in the south, with only small pockets of the horizon appeared to be preserved across the previous airfield, with the northern area of the site was far less impacted with modern disturbance. Due to the poor preservation identified at the site it suggests that there is limited archaeological activity preserved within the bounds of the site, with only the northern area producing any features of significance. But it is worth noting that this site is not reflective of the surrounding area.
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:
Rebecca Smart
Publisher
Publisher
The publisher of the publication or report
Publisher:
Cotswold Archaeology
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2022
Locations
Locations
Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published.
Locations:
District: West Suffolk
County: Suffolk
Parish: Hepworth
Country: England
Grid Reference: 598838, 273290 (Easting, Northing)
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods associated with this record.
Subjects / Periods:
BURNT MOUND (Monument Type England)
EARLY PREHISTORIC BURNT MOUND (Tag)
DITCH (Monument Type England)
POST MEDIEVAL DITCH (Tag)
EVALUATION (Event)
POST MEDIEVAL (Historic England Periods)
EARLY PREHISTORIC (Historic England Periods)
Identifiers
Identifiers
Identifiers associated with the publication. These might include DOIs, site codes, Monument Identifiers etc.
Identifiers:
OASIS Id: cotswold2-503296
Report id: SU0325_1
Note
Note
Extra information on the publication or report.
Note:
This report was uploaded to the OASIS system by the named Publisher. The report has been transferred into the ADS Library for public access and to facilitate future research.
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
OASIS (OASIS)
Relations
Relations
Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report
Relations:
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
09 Aug 2022