Tyers, C., Bridge, M. C., McCarroll, D., Bayliss, A. and Loader, N. (2022). Dendrochronological Survey at Bourn Mill, Caxton End. Fort Cumberland: Historic England. https://doi.org/10.5284/1100868. Cite this using datacite

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:		 Dendrochronological Survey at Bourn Mill, Caxton End
Series
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:		 Historic England Research Reports
Downloads
Downloads
Any files associated with the publication or report that can be downloaded from the ADS
Downloads:
nmr1-506668_189054.pdf (4 MB) : Download
Licence Type
Licence Type
ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC.
Licence Type:
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence icon
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International Licence
DOI
DOI
The DOI (digital object identifier) for the publication or report.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5284/1100868
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:		 Report (in Series)
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:		 Samples were taken from 21 of the various timber elements of the mill, including both oak and elm timbers. Conventional ring-width dendrochronology established that the main post was most likely felled in the first half of the sixteenth century, making this the earliest main post of a post mill yet dated. Felling dates for the sheers and front sheer spacer of spring AD 1703 and spring AD 1707 also indicated a previously unknown rebuilding phase, which is earlier than the known partial destruction of the mill during a storm in AD 1741. Other weak statistical matches between the ring-width series of oak and elm timbers were explored using other scientific dating techniques. The combined analysis confirmed that these other surviving timbers in the trestle probably date from repairs undertaken in AD 1874 and AD 1931 but suggested that many other timbers in the buck are eighteenth-century survivals. Samples were taken from 21 of the various timber elements of the mill, including both oak and elm timbers. Conventional ring-width dendrochronology established that the main post was most likely felled in the first half of the sixteenth century, making this the earliest main post of a post mill yet dated. Felling dates for the sheers and front sheer spacer of spring AD 1703 and spring AD 1707 also indicated a previously unknown rebuilding phase, which is earlier than the known partial destruction of the mill during a storm in AD 1741. Other weak statistical matches between the ring-width series of oak and elm timbers were explored using other scientific dating techniques. The combined analysis confirmed that these other surviving timbers in the trestle probably date from repairs undertaken in AD 1874 and AD 1931 but suggested that many other timbers in the buck are eighteenth-century survivals.
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:		 Cathy Tyers
Martin C Bridge
Danny McCarroll
Alex Bayliss ORCID icon
Neil J Loader
Publisher
Publisher
The publisher of the publication or report
Publisher:		 Historic England
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:		 2022
Locations
Locations
Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published.
Locations:
County: Cambridgeshire
District: South Cambridgeshire
Country: England
Parish: Bourn
Grid Reference: 531185, 258003 (Easting, Northing)
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods associated with this record.
Subjects / Periods:
DENDROCHRONOLOGICAL SURVEY (Event)
POST MILL (Monument Type England)
POST MEDIEVAL POST MILL (Tag)
POST MEDIEVAL (Historic England Periods)
Identifiers
Identifiers
Identifiers associated with the publication. These might include DOIs, site codes, Monument Identifiers etc.
Identifiers:
OASIS Id: nmr1-506668
Report id: 12/2022
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
OASIS (OASIS)
Relations
Relations
Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report
Relations:
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:		 21 Nov 2022