Moreno, J. and Davey, J. (2022). Evaluation at Ford Oaks Solar Farm, Marsh Green, Exeter. Archaeology Wales. https://doi.org/10.5284/1111222. Cite this using datacite

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
Evaluation at Ford Oaks Solar Farm, Marsh Green, Exeter
Series
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
Archaeology Wales unpublished report series
Downloads
Downloads
Any files associated with the publication or report that can be downloaded from the ADS
Downloads:
archaeol26-506934_193087.pdf (8 MB) : Download
Licence Type
Licence Type
ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC.
Licence Type:
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence icon
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International Licence
DOI
DOI
The DOI (digital object identifier) for the publication or report.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5284/1111222
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Report (in Series)
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:
Archaeology England conducted an archaeological trenched evaluation on the site of the proposed Ford Oaks Solar and Green Infrastructure Facility, Marsh Green, Exeter, Devon, EX5 2EU (centred on NGR: SY 0407 9346) during May and June 2022. The work comprised the excavation of 12 Evaluation Trenches in two separate locations approximately 800m apart. The location of the evaluation trenches was set out and recorded on British National Grid (NGR) co-ordinates with GPS surveying equipment. The position and size of Trench 9 was adjusted on site at the request of DCHET in order to test the terminus of an ‘L’ shaped linear anomaly recorded during the geophysical survey. Initially, all excavation works comprised the mechanical removal of non-archaeologically significant modern overburden, under constant archaeological supervision, using a toothless ditching bucket. All machining was conducted under archaeological supervision and ceased when the first archaeological horizon or natural substrate was revealed (whichever was encountered first). All archaeological features were recorded in plan, utilising GPS which enabled the production of accurate plan drawings at a scale of 1:20. The final ‘as dug’ areas were recorded accurately with GPS. The excavations at Marsh Green, Exeter comprised the trenched evaluation of twelve 30m Trenches positioned across two separate fields located approximately 800m apart. The excavations have demonstrated that the proposed development, as currently designed, is highly unlikely to impact on any significant impact archaeological sub-surface remains. The trenched archaeological evaluation at Marsh Green, Exeter, Devon followed on from an earlier geophysical survey which had highlighted the potential for a large number of linear anomalies (Edwards and Trick 2021). The identified anomalies included probable former field boundaries, and three groups interpreted as representing potential cultivation patterns. Two possible ditched enclosures potentially indicating prehistoric activity were also identified within the site, at its northwest and southeast extents, on the higher, more level parts of the site. The development design has subsequently taken account of the results of those surveys and some areas of geophysical anomalies likely to represent prehistoric enclosures have been removed from the development footprint. The evaluation trenches were therefore located only in areas within the re-designed development footprint. These areas were largely devoid of geophysical anomalies. It is perhaps unsurprising then that no archaeological features were recorded in any of these trenches given that this negative result corresponds with the results of the geophysical survey. Nevertheless, three trenches (Trenches 1 and 2 in Area 1 and Trench 9 in Area 2) were located over geophysical anomalies thought to represent the location of potential archaeological features. The east-west aligned linears expected in Trenches 1 and 2 were not present within the trenches. It is considered that these geophysical anomalies are rather the result of magnetic disturbance from the gas main running a few metres to the south. A north-south aligned anomaly recorded in Trench 2 was shown to be an archaeological feature: ditch [2003]. No finds were recovered from the fill of this ditch, so its date of origin is unknown. Nevertheless, it is associated with a former field boundary recorded on the Rockbeare Tithe Map of 1844 that remained in use until sometime between 1966 and 2003. Its location is still visible as a slight earthwork. An additional east-west aligned linear feature was recorded within Trench 4 and interpreted as a post-medieval stone-filled land drain [4003]. Trench 9 in Area 2 was positioned to try and locate the terminus of an ‘L’-shaped geophysical anomaly. No archaeological features were recorded within this trench.
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:
Juan Moreno
John Davey
Publisher
Publisher
The publisher of the publication or report
Publisher:
Archaeology Wales
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2022
Locations
Locations
Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published.
Locations:
County: Devon
District: East Devon
Country: England
Parish: Rockbeare
Grid Reference: 304069, 93459 (Easting, Northing)
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods associated with this record.
Subjects / Periods:
EVALUATION (Event)
POST MEDIEVAL LINEAR FEATURE (Tag)
POST MEDIEVAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM (Tag)
CERAMIC (Object England)
POST MEDIEVAL CERAMIC (Tag)
LINEAR FEATURE (Monument Type England)
DRAINAGE SYSTEM (Monument Type England)
NAIL (Object England)
POST MEDIEVAL NAIL (Tag)
POST MEDIEVAL (Historic England Periods)
Identifiers
Identifiers
Identifiers associated with the publication. These might include DOIs, site codes, Monument Identifiers etc.
Identifiers:
OASIS Id: archaeol26-506934
Report id: 2097
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
OASIS (OASIS)
Relations
Relations
Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report
Relations:
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
19 Jul 2023