Critchley, J. (2019). University Station, Heritage and Archaeological Assessment. Mott MacDonald Ltd. https://doi.org/10.5284/1111450. Cite this using datacite

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
University Station, Heritage and Archaeological Assessment
Series
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
Mott MacDonald unpublished report series
Downloads
Downloads
Any files associated with the publication or report that can be downloaded from the ADS
Downloads:
mottmacd2-512043_193989.pdf (11 MB) : Download
Licence Type
Licence Type
ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC.
Licence Type:
ADS Terms of Use and Access icon
ADS Terms of Use and Access
DOI
DOI
The DOI (digital object identifier) for the publication or report.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5284/1111450
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Report (in Series)
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:
This Heritage and Archaeological Assessment follows the guidance set out by the Chartered Institute for Archaeologists’ (CIfA) Standards and Guidance for Historic Environment Desk-Based Assessments (2014) and Historic England Good Practice Advice Note 2: Managing Significance in Decision-Taking in the Historic Environment (2015) and Note 3: The Setting of Heritage Assets (2017). In accordance with best practice guidance, and as determined by policy requirements, this assessment identifies the baseline heritage interest of the assets within this area. The historical narrative informing the baseline has been derived from a review of various resources, including: ● a search of the Historic England National Heritage List for England (NHLE) dataset for scheduled monuments, listed buildings, and registered parks and gardens within the study area; ● a search of the Birmingham City Council Historic Environment Record; ● an examination of local, regional and national planning policies in relation to the historic environment; ● an inspection of the cartographic evidence for the land use history of the site; and ● an assessment of relevant published and unpublished historical sources. This report has outlined the cultural heritage baseline within the study area, to understand the key archaeological and built heritage constraints in relation to the proposed redevelopment of University Station. Two assets have been identified within the scheme area. The first of these comprising the Scheduled Roman Forts at Metchley which covers areas of the former fort north of the railway where the potential for surviving archaeology is considered greatest. The second asset, the non-designated Metchley Roman Fort recorded on the Birmingham City HER, is larger in area and covers the area of the scheduled asset and the majority of the former footprint of the Roman fort. It is considered that the proposed development will result in less than substantial harm to both assets located in the scheme area. Evidential value will be affected during construction with some archaeological remains removed or truncated. However the design will be as such to avoid remains where possible and allow for preservation in situ. Where remains are removed they will be subject to archaeological recording. The method of recording will be agreed in advance with Historic England and the LPA. The work will also be subject to a scheduled monument consent application. In accordance with NPPF paragraph 194, harm to the significance of designated assets should have clear and convincing justification. In accordance with paragraph 196 any planning decision should weigh this harm against the public benefit of scheme. It is considered however that the proposed scheme will represent an improvement to the existing character of the scheme area, enhancing the ability to understand the significance of both Roman assets. If the recommendations outlined in this report are fulfilled the potential also exists to further existing knowledge of the fort. The scheme therefore offers demonstrable heritage benefits. A scheduled monument consent application will be submitted for the works within the footprint of the monument. To inform the scheduled monument consent application a ground model of indictive depths of known archaeology from the existing station in the south west to the site of the new station in the north east of the scheme area will be produced and shared with Historic England at the earliest opportunity. Other periods are not well represented in the known archaeological record in the study area, and previous archaeological events recorded on the Birmingham HER have primarily focused on the area of the fort.
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:
Joe Critchley
Publisher
Publisher
The publisher of the publication or report
Publisher:
Mott MacDonald Ltd
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2019
Locations
Locations
Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published.
Locations:
County: West Midlands
District: Birmingham
Country: England
Parish: Birmingham, unparished area
Grid Reference: 404403, 283702 (Easting, Northing)
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods associated with this record.
Subjects / Periods:
HERITAGE ASSESSMENT (Event)
Identifiers
Identifiers
Identifiers associated with the publication. These might include DOIs, site codes, Monument Identifiers etc.
Identifiers:
OASIS Id: mottmacd2-512043
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
OASIS (OASIS)
Relations
Relations
Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report
Relations:
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
24 Jul 2023