Morey, D. F. (2006). Burying key evidence:. J Archaeol Sci 33 (2). Vol 33(2), pp. 158-175.
Title The title of the publication or report |
Burying key evidence: | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subtitle The sub title of the publication or report |
the social bond between dogs and people | |||||
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
J Archaeol Sci 33 (2) | |||||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Journal of Archaeological Science | |||||
Volume Volume number and part |
33 (2) | |||||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
158 - 175 | |||||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability. | |||||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | |||||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
Considers the consistent and worldwide distribution of the burial or ritual disposal of dead dogs over about the past 12,000--14,000 years. Such practices directly reflect the domestic relationship between people and dogs, and speak rather directly to the timing of canid domestication. In doing so, they contradict recent genetics-based inferences, thus calling into question the legitimacy of focusing mostly on genetic factors as opposed to other factors. This discussion seeks to work towards a sound framework for analyzing and thus understanding the social compatibility between people and dogs. That compatibility is directly signified by the burial of dogs, with people often responding to the deaths of individual dogs much as they usually respond to the death of a family member. Moreover, that special social relationship continues, as illustrated clearly by the establishment, maintenance, and ongoing use of several modern dog cemeteries, in different countries of the world. | |||||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2006 | |||||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
|||||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(The British & Irish Archaeological Bibliography (BIAB))
|
|||||
Relations Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report |
|
|||||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
12 May 2006 |