Riley, R. (2005). The Notions of Production and Consumption in Industrial Archaeology. Understanding the Workplace. Vol 27(1), pp. 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1179/030907205X44358.

Title: The Notions of Production and Consumption in Industrial Archaeology
Subtitle: Towards a Research Agenda
Issue: Understanding the Workplace
Series: Industrial Archaeology Review
Volume: 27 (1)
Number of Pages: 184
Page Start/End: 41 - 47
Biblio Note The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability.
Publication Type: Journal
Abstract: Employing a framework of production and consumption, the paper sets out to identify weaknesses within industrial archaeology and to point towards [a] research agenda. Some 340 publications in the Journal of Industrial Archaeology, Industrial Archaeology and Industrial Archaeology Review are compared with the Standard Industrial Classification, revealing a skewed pattern in favour of four out of the nineteen industrial groups - metallic mining and processing, non-metallic mining and processing, textiles, and food and drink. Ten industrial groups attracting the most publications were selected for analysis, which indicates that the discipline is weak on twentieth-century industries with large plants, and on industries employing modern, sophisticated technology. It is demonstrated that when consumption is disaggregated into its four components, industrial archaeology is strong on intermediate manufacturing and distributive markets, and it is argued that weaknesses in wholesaling, retailing, and final domestic and service markets are more apparent than real.
Author: Ray Riley
Year of Publication: 2005
Source:
Source icon
BIAB (The British & Irish Archaeological Bibliography (BIAB))
Relations:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/030907205X44358
Created Date: 24 Feb 2006