Rudling, M. (2017). A comparison of poor relief in a Wealden parish and a South Downs parish in eastern Sussex c.1830-1860. Sussex Archaeological Collections 155. Vol 155, pp. 181-196. https://doi.org/10.5284/1086820. Cite this via datacite
Title The title of the publication or report |
A comparison of poor relief in a Wealden parish and a South Downs parish in eastern Sussex c.1830-1860 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Sussex Archaeological Collections 155 | ||||||||||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Sussex Archaeological Collections | ||||||||||
Volume Volume number and part |
155 | ||||||||||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
181 - 196 | ||||||||||
Downloads Any files associated with the publication or report that can be downloaded from the ADS |
|
||||||||||
Licence Type ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC. |
ADS Terms of Use and Access
|
||||||||||
DOI The DOI (digital object identifier) for the publication or report. |
|
||||||||||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | ||||||||||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
Regional studies of poor relief in the 19th century have identified contrasting welfare experiences. This study identifies variations in relief between two rural parishes in Sussex at the end of the Old Poor Law and during the first decades of the New Poor Law. Relief records from Chiddingly in the Weald and Rottingdean on the South Downs reveal that there were much higher levels of relief in the Wealden parish both before and after the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act. Variations in farming conditions and land ownership between these two areas led to a different profile of relief recipients. Small scale farming and surplus labour in the Wealden parish resulted in a high demand for out-relief from male labourers. Relief officials were used to supporting this group of men under the Old Poor Law and were reluctant to change their practices under the New. In contrast more prosperous farmers were able to provide full-time employment for labourers on the South Downs where relief payments were traditionally reserved for the elderly and for widows with young children. Poor relief payments rarely reached subsistence levels, and access to alternative resources was important, including the employment of wives and children, benefit clubs, charities and allotments. There appears to have been a wider range of resources available in the downland parish which may also explain why fewer people were dependent on relief. | ||||||||||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2017 | ||||||||||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
||||||||||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
||||||||||
Note Extra information on the publication or report. |
Supplementary material is available in the ADS Library | ||||||||||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
ADS Archive
(ADS Archive)
|
||||||||||
Relations Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report |
|
||||||||||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
11 Jun 2021 |