Exeter Archaeology (2004). Archaeological Assessment Of Proposed Family Centre University Of Exeter. Exeter Archaeology.

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
Archaeological Assessment Of Proposed Family Centre University Of Exeter
Number of Pages
Number of Pages
The number of pages in the publication or report
Number of Pages:
10
Biblio Note
Biblio Note
This is a Bibliographic record only.
Biblio Note
Please note that this is a bibliographic record only, as originally entered into the BIAB database. The ADS have no files for download, and unfortunately cannot advise further on where to access hard copy or digital versions.
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Report
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:
Doubts had been cast on the authenticity of the cropmark (site 3) immediately to the north of the site area, recorded as a possible prehistoric enclosure. Verbal confirmation had been obtained for the presence of the nearby prehistoric flint scatters (1, 6), but it had not been possible to locate the archive. The line of a possible prehistoric trackway (2) crossed the site. All that can be said, therefore, is that there were indications of some prehistoric activity or occupation in this general area. In later periods the site was almost certainly used for agriculture. No medieval or post-medieval features had been identified within the site area. The nearest 'structures' (site 7), present in 1945, were probably of a temporary nature. The artificial levelling of the site would have destroyed shallower archaeological deposits across the northern part of the site, whilst burying the earlier land surface in the southern part of the site. The trial pit logs suggested that the eastern third of the site was less disturbed; this includes the footprint of the proposed building. A plan supplied by the client also showed the positions of services (water pipes) in the south, east and north-eastern part of the site, and the presence of several badger sets towards the south-east corner. All the above activities would have had an impact on any underlying archaeological deposits, although substantial features cut into the subsoil, e.g. ditches, may have survived. It is thought that the greatest potential for this survival was in the least disturbed eastern part of the site. [Au(adp)]
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:
Exeter Archaeology
Publisher
Publisher
The publisher of the publication or report
Publisher:
Exeter Archaeology
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2004
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods associated with this record.
Subjects / Periods:
Postmedieval (Auto Detected Temporal)
Prehistoric (Auto Detected Temporal)
MEDIEVAL (Historic England Periods)
Note
Note
Extra information on the publication or report.
Note:
Date Of Issue From: 2004 Date Of Coverage From: 01 Date Of Coverage To: 01 Editorial Expansion: Site name: PROPOSED FAMILY CENTRE, UNIVERSITY OF EXETER
Study area: 1.4
Investigation type: Desk-based
District: Exeter
Monument: OBSERVATORY. Post-medieval (1540-1901), [finds]. Prehistoric, TRACKWAY. Prehistoric
Ngr: SX92009441
Parish: Exeter St. David
Postcode:
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
BIAB (Archaeological Investigations Project (AIP))
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
19 Jan 2009