Bruce, G. and Stanley, J. (2017). REPORT ON AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION BY TRIAL TRENCHING. On-Site Archaeology Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.5284/1109083. Cite this using datacite

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
REPORT ON AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION BY TRIAL TRENCHING
Series
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
On Site Archaeology unpublished report series
Downloads
Downloads
Any files associated with the publication or report that can be downloaded from the ADS
Downloads:
onsitear2-511857_193798.pdf (3 MB) : Download
onsitear2-511857_193798_1.pdf (8 MB) : Download
onsitear2-511857_193798_2.pdf (522 kB) : Download
Licence Type
Licence Type
ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC.
Licence Type:
ADS Terms of Use and Access icon
ADS Terms of Use and Access
DOI
DOI
The DOI (digital object identifier) for the publication or report.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5284/1109083
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Report (in Series)
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:
The evaluation was required as part of Condition 24 of the grant of outline planning permission (Planning Reference 15/04164/OUTMAJ). A total of five evaluation trenches were excavated in this phase, each measuring 50m by 2m at the modern ground surface. These trenches were placed to investigate apparently blank areas as defined by the geophysical survey. Archaeological mitigation for this site was conducted in various stages. Initially, two areas of strip and record were excavated to target geophysical anomalies and archaeological features found during the evaluation phases (Figure 2). The eastern area of the site, where geophysical survey and trial trenching indicated a concentration of archaeology was excavated as Area A. The expansion of the area previously investigated by trench 5 during the second phase of evaluation was recorded as Area B. In the areas of the site that were not to be developed, but were to be retained as public open spaces, the archaeology was to be preserved in-situ, with the existing topsoil and subsoil remaining in place. These areas were located within the northeast and southeast corners of the site and included a corridor along the eastern boundary of the site. The other parts of the site, which did not contain significant archaeological remains, were developed without the need for archaeological mitigation as had been agreed upon within the Mitigation Method Statement (OSA, January 2018). The second phase of works was undertaken outside the main development site along the line of a proposed surface water outfall pipe (Areas C and D) (Figure 2). The field where the pipe trench was proposed lay partially within the registered battlefield site of the Battle of Boroughbridge. Therefore, discussions were held with Dr Keith Emerick, Inspector of Ancient Monuments, Historic England regarding the scale and scope of archaeological investigations required. Following an archaeological investigation by geophysical survey and metal detector survey, further archaeological mitigation was carried out during the construction of the outfall trench to preserve by record any archaeological remains that may be disturbed by the development. This comprised of an archaeologically monitored topsoil strip of the proposed pipeline route, followed, as appropriate, by archaeological hand excavation and recording of any features identified. archaeological features dating to two main phases of occupation and activity; the middle to late Iron Age period and the late 1st to mid 2nd century Roman period. The earliest phase of activity largely comprised an enclosed Iron Age settlement. Numerous internal features were identified consisting of several probable former roundhouses and associated ditches, pits and postholes. A small area of probable associated settlement activity, comprising poorly preserved structures comparable with the features within the enclosure, was also located to the northwest of the enclosure. Only Iron Age, hand-made pottery, was recovered from the internal features of the principal enclosure indicating abandonment or disuse of the internal area after the Iron Age period. Activity during the Roman period appears to be represented by the shallower redefinition and extension of the existing principal enclosure and the creation of additional land division. The lack of domestic features associated with the Roman ditches appears to reflect a change of use, from settlement to agricultural land use during the early Roman period.
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:
Graham Bruce
James Stanley
Publisher
Publisher
The publisher of the publication or report
Publisher:
On-Site Archaeology Ltd.
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2017
Locations
Locations
Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published.
Locations:
District: Harrogate
County: North Yorkshire
Country: England
Parish: Milby
Grid Reference: 439831, 467474 (Easting, Northing)
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods associated with this record.
Subjects / Periods:
EVALUATION (Event)
BOUNDARY DITCH (Monument Type England)
IRON AGE RUBBISH PIT (Tag)
IRON AGE ROUND HOUSE (DOMESTIC) (Tag)
DITCHED ENCLOSURE (Monument Type England)
RUBBISH PIT (Monument Type England)
METAL DETECTING SURVEY (Event)
ROMAN DITCHED ENCLOSURE (Tag)
ROUND HOUSE (DOMESTIC) (Monument Type England)
IRON AGE BOUNDARY DITCH (Tag)
OPEN AREA EXCAVATION (Event)
IRON AGE (Historic England Periods)
ROMAN (Historic England Periods)
Identifiers
Identifiers
Identifiers associated with the publication. These might include DOIs, site codes, Monument Identifiers etc.
Identifiers:
OASIS Id: onsitear2-511857
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
OASIS (OASIS)
Relations
Relations
Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report
Relations:
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
06 Jul 2023