The Sutton Hoo Research Project 1983-2001

Martin Carver, 2004. https://doi.org/10.5284/1000266. How to cite using this DOI

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000266
Sample Citation for this DOI

Martin Carver (2004) The Sutton Hoo Research Project 1983-2001 [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000266

Data copyright © Prof Martin Carver unless otherwise stated

This work is licensed under the ADS Terms of Use and Access.
Creative Commons License


University of York logo

Primary contact

Prof Martin Carver
Department of Archaeology
University of York
King's Manor
Exhibition Square
York
YO1 7EP
England

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000266
Sample Citation for this DOI

Martin Carver (2004) The Sutton Hoo Research Project 1983-2001 [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000266

Downloads


Index to Field Report Volume 7: Field Report For The East Sector Int 50

Authors: Madeleine Hummler, Andy Copp and Martin Carver

  1. SUMMARY
  2. STRATEGY
    • 2.1 Aims and objectives
    • 2.2 Operations undertaken
    • 2.3 Recovery levels
    • 2.4 Modifications to strategy
    • 2.5 Analyses Undertaken
  3. METHODS AND RESULTS: THE DATA ACQUIRED (AJC)
    • 3.1 Procedures
    • 3.2 Pre-excavation surface and subsurface surveys
    • 3.3 Horizon definition and recording
    • 3.4 Definition of features at Horizon 1
    • 3.5 Definition of features at Horizon 2/7
    • 3.6 Definition and recording of Burials
    • 3.7 Definition and recording of Mound 14 (G. Bruce)
    • 3.8 [unused]
    • 3.9 The assemblage (MRH)
  4. MODELLING THE SEQUENCE (MRH)
    • 4.1 Evidence for strata formation processes
    • 4.2 Evidence from stratigraphy
    • 4.3 Evidence for sequence and date from finds
    • 4.4 Evidence for sequence and date from context descriptions
    • 4.5 Evidence for absolute dating
    • 4.6 Model for the sequence
  5. SELECTED STUDIES: THE PREHISTORIC PERIOD (AJC/MRH)
    • 5.1 Natural and vegetational features
    • 5.2 Ditch system F62/155
    • 5.3 Ditches F356 and F386 beneath Mound 14
    • 5.4 Pit cluster F300 etc. and its assemblage
    • 5.5 Fence-line F8 etc.
    • 5.6 Miscellaneous features
  6. SELECTED STUDIES: THE ROMAN PERIOD [none]
  7. SELECTED STUDIES: THE EARLY MEDIEVAL PERIOD
    • 7.1 Burial 8: Mound 14 (MOHC)
    • 7.2 Furnished burials (Burial 15 and 16)
    • 7.3 Satellite burials to Mound 5 (Burials 54 and 55)
    • 7.4 Inconclusive or negative identifications of graves
    • 7.5 Quarry pits to Mound 6
  8. SELECTED STUDIES: THE MEDIEVAL PERIOD AND LATER (MOHC/AJC)
    • 8.1 F265 - Trackway
    • 8.2 The robbing of Mound 14 [See section 7.1.6]
    • 8.3 F267 - Plough marks
    • 8.4 F323 - Pit
Download full report:
Vol 7 Field Report for the East Sector: Int 50 (PDF, 492Kb)

ADS logo
Data Org logo
University of York logo
alt=