This page (revision-39) was last changed on 09-Jan-2019 15:56 by Nick Boldrini

This page was created on 17-Sep-2012 11:58 by Alison Bennett

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
39 09-Jan-2019 15:56 14 KB Nick Boldrini to previous
38 04-Oct-2016 14:09 14 KB Stephanie Leith to previous | to last
37 12-May-2016 15:08 13 KB Chris Martin to previous | to last
36 01-Apr-2015 16:13 13 KB Charlotte Orchard to previous | to last
35 01-Apr-2015 16:12 13 KB Charlotte Orchard to previous | to last
34 25-Mar-2015 10:01 13 KB Martin Newman to previous | to last
33 16-Mar-2015 09:41 12 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last
32 16-Mar-2015 09:38 12 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last
31 16-Mar-2015 09:37 12 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last
30 16-Mar-2015 09:36 12 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last
29 23-Feb-2015 18:08 12 KB Alison Bennett to previous | to last
28 23-Feb-2015 17:41 12 KB Alison Bennett to previous | to last
27 13-Nov-2014 17:22 14 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last
26 13-Nov-2014 17:20 14 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last
25 13-Nov-2014 17:15 14 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last
24 13-Nov-2014 17:13 14 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last
23 01-Sep-2014 11:41 14 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last
22 01-Sep-2014 11:40 14 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last
21 01-Sep-2014 11:37 14 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
SectionA.8
SectionA.8

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 4 changed one line
''An Assessment of SMRs in England'' (Baker 1999a), ''Scotland'' (Baker 1999b) and ''Wales'' (Baker unpublished) has shown that their development has been uneven and often on an ad hoc basis. However, more recent research such as the ''SMR Content and Computing Survey'' (Newman 2002), has shown that the situation is improving. The government HER consultation results, ''HER Benchmarks for Good Practice'' (Chitty 2002) and ''Resource needs for SMRs and UADs to reach the first stage benchmarks'' (Baker, Chitty and Edwards 2004) (relating to England) have shown a way forward for future continued improvement in the key areas described below.
''An Assessment of SMRs in England'' ([Baker 1999a|Bibliography#Baker 1999a|target='_blank']), ''Scotland'' ([Baker 1999b|Bibliography#Baker 1999b|target='_blank']) and ''Wales'' (Baker unpublished) has shown that their development has been uneven and often on an ad hoc basis. However, more recent research such as the [''SMR Content and Computing Survey'' (Newman 2002)|Bibliography#Newman 2002|target='_blank'], has shown that the situation is improving. The government HER consultation results, ''HER Benchmarks for Good Practice'' ([Chitty 2002|Bibliography#Chitty 2002|target='_blank']) and ''Resource needs for SMRs and UADs to reach the first stage benchmarks'' [(Baker, Chitty and Edwards 2004)|Bibliography#Baker, Chitty and Edwards 2004|target='_blank'] (relating to England) have shown a way forward for future continued improvement in the key areas described below.
At line 7 changed one line
Recent years have seen much greater co-operation between the key national organisations with an interest in the development of English HERs (English Heritage, ALGAO, RCAHMW, RCAHMS, IHBC, DCMS and MLA) since RCHME, ALGAO and English Heritage signed a co-operation statement containing agreed key principles governing SMR development in 1998 (RCHME, ALGAO and English Heritage 1998). The statement set out a shared vision of a national network of heritage records maintained to common standards and accessible to a wide variety of users. Since 1998, this partnership has underpinned a number of projects, including the SMR assessment (Baker 1999a), and preparation of a framework document for the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) to guide bids from HERs for funding, recently updated as ‘[Unlocking Our Past|https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=HERFORUM&f=/Guidelines]' (EH/ALGAO 2005).
Recent years have seen much greater co-operation between the key national organisations with an interest in the development of [HERs|Glossary#HER|target='_blank'] ([Historic England|Glossary#Historic England|target='_blank'], [ALGAO|Glossary#ALGAO UK|target='_blank'], [RCAHMW|Glossary#RCAHMW|target='_blank'], [RCAHMS|Glossary#RCAHMS|target='_blank'], [Historic Environment Scotland|https://www.historicenvironment.scot/], [IHBC|Glossary#IHBC|target='_blank'], [DCMS|Glossary#DCMS|target='_blank'] and [MLA|Glossary#MLA|target='_blank']) since RCHME, ALGAO and English Heritage (prior to transfer to Historic England) signed a co-operation statement containing agreed key principles governing [SMR|Glossary#SMR|target='_blank'] development in 1998 ([RCHME, ALGAO and English Heritage 1998|Bibliography#RCHME ALGAO and English Heritage 1998|target='_blank']). The statement set out a shared vision of a national network of heritage records maintained to common standards and accessible to a wide variety of users. Since 1998, this partnership has underpinned a number of projects, including the SMR assessment ([Baker 1999a|Bibliography#Baker 1999a|target='_blank']), and preparation of a framework document for the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) to guide bids from HERs for funding, recently updated as [‘Unlocking Our Past' (English Heritage and ALGAO 2005)|Bibliography#English Heritage and ALGAO 2005|target='_blank'] .
At line 9 changed one line
Following the Baker report (Baker 1999a) ALGAO produced a strategy for HERs (ALGAO 2000) which set out the Association's intention to work with the national partners to:
Following the Baker report ([Baker 1999a|Bibliography#Baker 1999a|target='_blank']) ALGAO produced a strategy for HERs ([ALGAO 2000|Bibliography#ALGAO 2000|target='_blank']) which set out the Association's intention to work with the national partners to:
At line 15 changed one line
In England, English Heritage, ALGAO, IHBC, DCMS and MLA meet regularly in an HER Working Party which has taken the lead in such initiatives as the first edition of this manual as well as its revision, in the ''Benchmarks for Good Practice'' (Chitty 2002), ''Resource needs for SMRs and UADs to reach the first stage benchmarks'' (Baker, Chitty and Edwards 2004) and a framework document for Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) support for HER Outreach, ''Unlocking Britain's Past'' (HLF 1999) and ''Unlocking Our Past'' (English Heritage/ALGAO 2005). The challenge for the future is for the partners to successfully influence both national and local government to provide greater stability and increased resources to support the further development of HERs.
In England, [Historic England|Glossary#Historic England|target='_blank'], ALGAO, IHBC, DCMS and MLA meet regularly in an HER Working Party which has taken the lead in such initiatives as the first edition of this manual as well as its revision, in the ''Benchmarks for Good Practice'' ([Chitty 2002|Bibliography#Chitty 2002|target='_blank']), ''Resource needs for SMRs and UADs to reach the first stage benchmarks'' [(Baker, Chitty and Edwards 2004)|Bibliography#Baker, Chitty and Edwards 2004|target='_blank'] and a framework document for Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) support for HER Outreach, [''Unlocking Britain's Past'' (HLF 1999)|Bibliography#HLF 1999|target='_blank'] and [''Unlocking Our Past'' (English Heritage and ALGAO 2005)|Bibliography#English Heritage and ALGAO 2005|target='_blank']. The challenge for the future is for the partners to successfully influence both national and local government to provide greater stability and increased resources to support the further development of HERs.
At line 17 changed one line
Similarly partnership in Wales between Cadw, RCAHMW, NMGW and the WATs has led to the ''Strategic Framework for Historic Environment Records in Wales'' (Cadw et al 2005).
Similarly partnership in Wales between [Cadw|Glossary#Cadw|target='_blank'], RCAHMW, [NMGW|Glossary#NMGW|target='_blank'] and the [WATs|Glossary#WAT|target='_blank'] has led to the [''Strategic Framework for Historic Environment Records in Wales'' (Cadw et al 2005)|Bibliography#Cadw et al 2005|target='_blank'].
At line 19 changed one line
In 2003 the Scottish SMRs and the RCAHMS agreed a Co-operation Statement (published in 2005) which sets out their aim to work together in a number of areas: liaison, on-line resources, user feedback and analysis, workshops and training, joint services, education and tourism and research. ([www.rcahms.gov.uk|http://www.rcahms.gov.uk/local-authority-archaeological-liaison-project.html])
In 2003 the Scottish SMRs and the RCAHMS agreed a [Co-operation Statement (published in 2005)|Bibliography#RCAHMS 2005|target='_blank'] which sets out their aim to work together in a number of areas: liaison, on-line resources, user feedback and analysis, workshops and training, joint services, education and tourism and research. ([www.rcahms.gov.uk|http://www.rcahms.gov.uk/local-authority-archaeological-liaison-project.html|target='_blank'])
At line 21 added 6 lines
In 2014 the Scottish SMR Forum published Scotland’s Historic Environment Data Strategy ([the SHED Strategy|http://smrforum-scotland.org.uk/shed/]). The strategy is a sector-wide initiative to improve access to information about Scotland’s historic environment. The key aim is to work in partnership in order to protect, promote and enhance Scotland’s historic environment through coordinated activity to improve the data, and the associated systems and processes.
The partnership includes HERs, government agencies, non-government organisations (NGOs), and academic institutions, but also supports the public’s involvement in the care and enjoyment of the historic environment through better records.
In the last few years (2019), Historic England has been leading the sector in the HIAS (Heritage Information Access Strategy) process. This aims to streamline and improve information flows for the sector, and this has a significant element involving HER's.
At line 22 changed one line
There is now a widespread acceptance of the importance of data standards and three key platforms for this, the event-monument-source data model, the high level MIDAS (Lee 1998) standard and the national reference data terminology lists (INSCRIPTION) have already been agreed by HERs and NMR in England/Wales. These high level standards are available on the web site for use by any HERs. No comparable work on data standards has taken place in Scotland, but agreement to co-operate on these is included in the Co-operation Statement between SMRs and RCAHMS (RCAHMS 2005). More detailed data standards are being developed in Scotland under the auspices of the ASPIRE project ([http://www.aspire-resource.info]) and the Scottish SMR Forum.
There is now a widespread acceptance of the importance of data standards and three key platforms for this, the event-monument-source data model, the high level [MIDAS Heritage|Glossary#MIDAS Heritage|target='_blank'] ([FISH 2012|Bibliography#FISH 2012|target='_blank']) standard and the national reference data terminology lists ([INSCRIPTION|Glossary#INSCRIPTION|target='_blank']) have already been agreed by HERs, [Historic England|Glossary#Historic England|target='_blank'] and NMRW. MIDAS and INSCRIPTION have also been adopted as data standards in Scotland. These high level standards are available on the web site for use by any HERs.
At line 24 changed one line
These standards have and will inevitably develop in the light of practical experience and in response to new areas. A forum for discussing developments in data standards is already in place, the Forum on Information Standards in Heritage (FISH); its work and that of other standard-setting groups will continue. Challenges for the future will include developing standards for archaeological spatial data, an aspect currently being addressed and working towards common standards for heritage information across the UK. (See B.6, E.4)
These standards have and will inevitably develop in the light of practical experience and in response to new areas. A forum for discussing developments in data standards is already in place, the [Forum on Information Standards in Heritage (FISH)|Glossary#FISH|target='_blank']; its work and that of other standard-setting groups will continue. Challenges for the future will include developing standards for archaeological spatial data, an aspect currently being addressed and working towards common standards for heritage information across the UK. (See [B.6|SectionB.6], [E.4|SectionE.4])
At line 27 changed one line
Many archaeologists have long recognised the need for a framework for regional archaeological research and are responding positively to the English Heritage recommendation for the publication of research frameworks. These documents provide a structure within which decisions can be taken on the protection, management and recording of the archaeological resource at local levels and relate national strategies to those needs. Recent examples are the archaeological research frameworks for East Anglia (Glazebrook 1997; Brown and Glazebrook 2000) and the Greater Thames Estuary (Williams and Brown 1999) which provide an assessment of the archaeological resource of these regions and highlight areas where HER enhancements or links between neighbouring HERs need to be developed. In 2005 English Heritage published a national Research Framework (English Heritage 2005b; 2005c). Wales is similarly engaged in producing a national framework and the current statement can be seen at [http://www.archaeoleg.org.uk/index.html]. Scotland is presently at an earlier stage of the process although the need for frameworks is recognised.
Many archaeologists have long recognised the need for a framework for regional archaeological research and responded positively to the English Heritage recommendation for the publication of [research frameworks|Glossary#Research frameworks|target='_blank']. These documents provide a structure within which decisions can be taken on the protection, management and recording of the archaeological resource at local levels and relate national strategies to those needs. Recent examples are the archaeological research frameworks for East Anglia ([Glazebrook 1997|Bibliography#Glazebrook 1997|target='_blank']; [Brown and Glazebrook 2000|Bibliography#Brown and Glazebrook 2000|target='_blank']) and the Greater Thames Estuary ([Williams and Brown 1999|Bibliography#Williams and Brown 1999|target='_blank']) which provide an assessment of the archaeological resource of these regions and highlight areas where HER enhancements or links between neighbouring HERs need to be developed. In 2005 English Heritage published a national Research Framework ([English Heritage 2005a|Bibliography#English Heritage 2005a|target='_blank']; [English Heritage 2005c|Bibliography#English Heritage 2005c|target='_blank']). Wales is similarly engaged in producing a national framework and the current statement can be seen at [http://www.archaeoleg.org.uk/index.html|http://www.archaeoleg.org.uk/index.html|target='_blank'].
At line 35 added 2 lines
In 2012 the Scottish Archaeological Research Framework ([ScARF|http://www.scottishheritagehub.com/]) was launched by the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, with funding from Historic Scotland. ScARF provides a national research framework, divided up into sections mostly by period, but with a few sections based on themes. The work was overseen by nine specialist panels under co-chairmen, providing open discussion and contributions from the wider sector. ScARF is presented online as a wiki, with a view to it being a live document that is updated over time.
At line 30 changed one line
Until recently, apart from a few pioneering HERs, most had limited resources to devote to widening use of their records. Since the Heritage Lottery Fund published a framework document ''Unlocking Britain's Past'' (HLF 1999) updated as ''Unlocking Our Past'' (English Heritage/ALGAO 2005) to guide HER bids with an emphasis on outreach, education and access projects the position has changed. Several HERs in England including Cheshire, Essex, Durham, Herefordshire, Kent, Northumberland, Somerset, and Warwickshire have been successful in securing HLF funding for such projects. In 2002-03, a proof of concept project, Accessing Scotland's Past ([http:\\www.accessingscotlandspast.org.uk]), was piloted between RCAHMS and two Scottish SMRs. Some HERs have also been able to take advantage of other government initiatives, such as the New Opportunities Fund(NOF) and the New Libraries Network. All these should enable greater public access to HERs, both directly through the provision of office space and computer access and remotely via libraries, record offices and the internet. The exciting and innovative projects that are now being developed should result in a broader awareness of HERs and their importance. Public interest and enthusiasm for the historic environment and conservation, partially developed through popular television programmes, is also being harnessed to develop a two-way flow of information between HERs and local people with an interest in learning more about, and recording, their local historic environment.
Until recently, apart from a few pioneering HERs, most had limited resources to devote to widening use of their records. Since the Heritage Lottery Fund published a framework document [''Unlocking Britain's Past'' (HLF 1999)|Bibliography#HLF 1999|target='_blank'] updated as [''Unlocking Our Past'' (English Heritage and ALGAO 2005)|Bibliography#English Heritage and ALGAO 2005|target='_blank'] to guide HER bids with an emphasis on outreach, education and access projects the position has changed. Several HERs in England including Cheshire, Essex, Durham, Herefordshire, Kent, Northumberland, Somerset, and Warwickshire have been successful in securing HLF funding for such projects. Some HERs have also been able to take advantage of other government initiatives, such as the [New Opportunities Fund(NOF)|Glossary#NOF|target='_blank'] and the New Libraries Network. All these should enable greater public access to HERs, both directly through the provision of office space and computer access and remotely via libraries, record offices and the internet. The exciting and innovative projects that are now being developed should result in a broader awareness of HERs and their importance. Public interest and enthusiasm for the historic environment and conservation, partially developed through popular television programmes, is also being harnessed to develop a two-way flow of information between HERs and local people with an interest in learning more about, and recording, their local historic environment.
At line 33 changed 2 lines
In recent years, at a national and international level, a number of initiatives have been developed to co-ordinate information systems and services for archaeological and architectural conservation. One example is the Historic Environment Information Resources Network, or HEIRNET, a consortium of UK bodies seeking to facilitate common standards and support communications links between information systems relating to the historic environment. A report, ''HEIRNET: Users and their Uses of HEIRs'' (HEIRNET 2002) prepared for this consortium on the increasing numbers of Historic Environment Information Resources (HEIRS) (see [http://www.britarch.ac.uk/HEIRNET]) recommended that:
*a central register of HEIRs should be created and supported by the community of information systems, which has now been created at [http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/heirnet/index.cfm]
In recent years, at a national and international level, a number of initiatives have been developed to co-ordinate information systems and services for archaeological and architectural conservation. One example is the Historic Environment Information Resources Network, or HEIRNET, a consortium of UK bodies seeking to facilitate common standards and support communications links between information systems relating to the historic environment. A report, [''HEIRNET: Users and their Uses of HEIRs'' (Grant 2002)|Bibliography#Grant 2002|target='_blank'] prepared for this consortium on the increasing numbers of Historic Environment Information Resources (HEIRS) (see [http://www.britarch.ac.uk/HEIRNET|http://www.britarch.ac.uk/HEIRNET|target='_blank']) recommended that:
*a central register of HEIRs should be created and supported by the community of information systems, which has now been created at [http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/heirnet/index.cfm|http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/heirnet/index.cfm|target='_blank']
At line 38 changed one line
Such moves are timely and may help archaeologists improve their input to the new regional organisations recently set up by government (such as regional development agencies, regional cultural consortia). The developing regional structure in England provides an opportunity for establishing improved arrangements for the protection and enhancement of the historic environment through closer co-operation and the development of partnerships between local-authority archaeologists and others with a concern for the historic environment. At the international level there is also a growing trend towards co-operation, both in terms of the creation of international standards such as the Comité International pour la Documentation (CIDOC), and through joint projects funded for example by the various European Community schemes. (See also CARN under A.6.3 above)
Another example is [SHINE|Glossary#SHINE|target='_blank'], the Selected Heritage Inventory for Natural England, which provides a single methodology that allows HERs to
input data from their local record into a single nationally consistent dataset. SHINE represents an important step forward in managing the historic environment in rural England, ensuring that features that are manageable under agri-environment schemes are mapped to consistent national standards, promoting positive, appropriate management of the historic environment in close partnership with Natural England and English Heritage.
At line 49 added 2 lines
Such moves are timely and may help archaeologists improve their input to the new regional organisations recently set up by government (such as regional development agencies, regional cultural consortia). The developing regional structure in England provides an opportunity for establishing improved arrangements for the protection and enhancement of the historic environment through closer co-operation and the development of partnerships between local-authority archaeologists and others with a concern for the historic environment. At the international level there is also a growing trend towards co-operation, both in terms of the creation of international standards such as the [Comité International pour la Documentation (CIDOC)|Glossary#CIDOC|target='_blank'], and through joint projects funded for example by the various European Community schemes.
At line 41 changed one line
The development at both national and local level of a more integrated approach to the management of the historic environment has led to a widening of information sources which are now broader in scope than what was understood by the term 'SMR'. It is in part this which has led to a change of name to ‘Historic Environment Record'. This has proceeded by concensus following discussion by the HER Forum and adopted by EH and ALGAO at their HER working party. Most English and Welsh HERs now contain a record of the built heritage, some contain details of palaeoenvironmental sites and/or links to geological and ecological records. This approach has not yet been adopted in Scotland.
In 2009, English Heritage carried out a point-in-time survey of SMRs/HERS, looking at how SMRs were moving into HERs and the different work that was being carried out. Although many HERs have now moved beyond this, the case studies contained in this publication will still have relevance to some HERs.
At line 43 changed one line
Statutory status, the proposed portal for the historic environment (the Heritage Gateway, a NMRE initiative in collaboration with ALGAO and IHBC see A.2.8), the trend towards integration of archaeology, the built environment and biological records is in line with national government policy towards modernisation. The ''Modernising Government White Paper'' (HMSO 1999) set out a timetable for government departments to deliver services to the public which 'join up' functions currently served by different departments (for Scotland, see [Open Scotland|http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/02/18979/33552], and also the [PastMap|http://jura.rcahms.gov.uk/PASTMAP/start.jsp] project that provides access to the Scottish National Archaeological and Architectural Datasets that are maintained by Historic Scotland, RCAHMS, Scottish Natural Heritage and some SMRs). Government departments are required to develop.a timetable for implementing electronic services that are available for 24 hours each day. These requirements give increased impetus to HERs to enhance their databases, adopting GIS, digitising collections and meeting the ''Benchmarks for Good Practice'' (Chitty 2002) to provide greater public access in line with the Government's stated objective of access for all, not just a few. Overall, these pressures, with the moves towards regional structures by national government, will pose the question of whether the.current structure of HER provision can adequately resource the needs of a more 'joined-up' approach to the historic environment.
The publication can be found at: [http://www.historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/smr-to-her-local-authority-case-studies/|http://www.historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/smr-to-her-local-authority-case-studies/|target='_blank']
At line 45 changed one line
Statutory status proposed for England, the proposed portal for the historic environment (the Heritage Gateway, an NMR initiative in collaboration with ALGAO and IHBC), Pastmap in Scotland and Coflein and Historic Wales) and the greater interoperability being provided by FISH through their interoperability toolkit will continue to open up new challenges and opportunities for HERs in the future.
Another suite of case studies was funded by English Heritage and undertaken between March 2010 and March 2011, as part of Government led Heritage Protection Reform. These case studies were specifically intended to address areas where future work was needed. These projects were grouped as HER21, with the intention of developing HERs for the 21st century.
More information on this and copies of the case studies can be found here: [http://www.historicengland.org.uk/advice/technical-advice/information-management/support-for-hers/|http://www.historicengland.org.uk/advice/technical-advice/information-management/support-for-hers/|target='_blank'].
This page (revision-39) was last changed on 09-Jan-2019 15:56 by Nick BoldriniTop