This page (revision-13) was last changed on 31-Mar-2015 17:14 by Alison Bennett

This page was created on 17-Sep-2012 14:46 by Alison Bennett

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
13 31-Mar-2015 17:14 18 KB Alison Bennett to previous
12 31-Mar-2015 17:13 18 KB Alison Bennett to previous | to last
11 30-Mar-2015 16:56 16 KB Alison Bennett to previous | to last
10 30-Mar-2015 16:31 16 KB Alison Bennett to previous | to last
9 23-Mar-2015 15:36 16 KB Antony Firth to previous | to last
8 23-Mar-2015 15:27 16 KB Antony Firth to previous | to last
7 03-Mar-2015 16:07 14 KB Alison Bennett to previous | to last
6 14-Nov-2014 10:05 14 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last
5 14-Nov-2014 09:54 14 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last
4 24-Oct-2012 12:40 14 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last
3 19-Oct-2012 12:38 13 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last
2 20-Sep-2012 17:02 13 KB Alison Bennett to previous | to last
1 17-Sep-2012 14:46 15 KB Alison Bennett to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 4 changed one line
In his assessment report, David Baker recommended that HERs should be all-inclusive of subject and period for archaeology and preferably for all aspects of the historic environment for a defined geographic area (Baker 1999a). This is endorsed in ''Benchmarks for Good Practice'' which for the 1st stage states that "the record should be inclusive of subject and period for all archaeology terrestrial and maritime" and should "provide comprehensive coverage for statutory and non-statutory designated historic places". It also states that a "written policy setting out the scope, geographical coverage and content" is required (Chitty, 2002, p.6 benchmarks 2.1 and 2.2). Looking beyond this broad-brush statement, HER managers are recommended to set out the scope and content of their record in their recording guidelines and to have a collecting and disposal policy for archive material. The publication of the ''Hedgerow Regulations'' (DoE 1997) underlined the need for a clear statement of what data and other information comprises a local HER.
In his assessment report, David Baker recommended that HERs should be all-inclusive of subject and period for archaeology and preferably for all aspects of the historic environment for a defined geographic area (Baker 1999a). This is endorsed in ''Benchmarks for Good Practice'' which for the 1st stage states that "the record should be inclusive of subject and period for all archaeology terrestrial and maritime" and should "provide comprehensive coverage for statutory and non-statutory designated historic places". It also states that a "written policy setting out the scope, geographical coverage and content" is required (Chitty, 2002, p.6 benchmarks 2.1 and 2.2). Looking beyond this broad-brush statement, HER managers are recommended to set out the scope and content of their record in their recording guidelines and to have a collecting and disposal policy for archive material. The publication of the ''Hedgerow Regulations'' ([DoE 1997|http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/1160/made]) underlined the need for a clear statement of what data and other information comprises a local HER.