This page (revision-9) was last changed on 01-Apr-2015 16:22 by Alison Bennett

This page was created on 18-Sep-2012 10:23 by Alison Bennett

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
9 01-Apr-2015 16:22 11 KB Alison Bennett to previous
8 11-Mar-2015 14:38 11 KB Nick Boldrini to previous | to last
7 11-Mar-2015 14:38 11 KB Nick Boldrini to previous | to last
6 03-Feb-2015 16:21 10 KB Alison Bennett to previous | to last
5 03-Feb-2015 16:08 8 KB Alison Bennett to previous | to last
4 14-Nov-2014 13:27 8 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last
3 14-Nov-2014 13:27 8 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last
2 14-Nov-2014 13:27 8 KB Sarah MacLean to previous | to last
1 18-Sep-2012 10:23 8 KB Alison Bennett to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
SectionC.12
SectionC.12

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 4 changed one line
The risks facing archaeological monuments in the landscape are well documented (Darvill and Fulton 1998) Many of the potential threats of damage or destruction can be avoided, or significantly reduced, by adopting a sympathetic management regime for the monument. Organisations with direct responsibilities for conservation of the historic environment, such as the National Trust and the National Parks, can implement such a regime using the HER as a key tool. Some HERs are also beginning to record this information as a result of co-operation with departments of their local authorities who manage land (for example Country Parks), through English Heritage-funded projects to secure management agreements for scheduled monuments and as part of historic buildings-at-risk surveys.
The risks facing archaeological monuments in the landscape are well documented ([Darvill and Fulton 1998|Bibliography#Darvill and Fulton 1998|target='_blank') Many of the potential threats of damage or destruction can be avoided, or significantly reduced, by adopting a sympathetic management regime for the monument. Organisations with direct responsibilities for conservation of the historic environment, such as the National Trust and the National Parks, can implement such a regime using the HER as a key tool. Some HERs are also beginning to record this information as a result of co-operation with departments of their local authorities who manage land (for example Country Parks), through English Heritage-funded projects to secure management agreements for scheduled monuments and as part of historic buildings-at-risk surveys.
At line 45 changed one line
Such information about monument management activities falls within the MIDAS definition of an event. Details about the management activity may be entered on an event record. Detailed information about maintenance contracts, including the costs of labour, material and equipment and the repeat schedule for routine maintenance visits, may also be recorded. By entering these details on a HER it is possible to track work, produce new work schedules (using criteria such as type of work, priority and work pending) and produce reports giving the full management history for a monument.
Such information about monument management activities falls within the [MIDAS|Glossary#MIDAS|target='_blank'] definition of an event. Details about the management activity may be entered on an event record. Detailed information about maintenance contracts, including the costs of labour, material and equipment and the repeat schedule for routine maintenance visits, may also be recorded. By entering these details on a HER it is possible to track work, produce new work schedules (using criteria such as type of work, priority and work pending) and produce reports giving the full management history for a monument.
This page (revision-9) was last changed on 01-Apr-2015 16:22 by Alison BennettTop