This page (revision-31) was last changed on 18-Sep-2012 10:40 by Alison Bennett

This page was created on 14-Jun-2012 13:25 by David Wheatley

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
31 18-Sep-2012 10:40 750 bytes Alison Bennett to previous
30 18-Sep-2012 10:38 847 bytes Alison Bennett to previous | to last
29 18-Sep-2012 10:38 843 bytes Alison Bennett to previous | to last
28 14-Sep-2012 15:53 777 bytes Alison Bennett to previous | to last
27 29-Aug-2012 14:05 121 KB Paul Gilman to previous | to last
26 27-Jun-2012 15:05 121 KB Administrator to previous | to last
25 27-Jun-2012 12:46 121 KB Administrator to previous | to last
24 27-Jun-2012 12:35 121 KB Administrator to previous | to last
23 14-Jun-2012 16:32 121 KB Lynn Dyson-Bruce to previous | to last
22 14-Jun-2012 16:31 121 KB Lynn Dyson-Bruce to previous | to last
21 14-Jun-2012 16:31 121 KB Lynn Dyson-Bruce to previous | to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
SectionE
SectionE

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 596 changed one line
HLC in conjunction with other historic data can support the Entry Level Schemes (ELS) and Higher Level Schemes (HLS) under Common Agricultural Policy, replacing the former Countryside Stewardship and ESAs schemes. The Land Management Information Service (LaMIS) illustrated here (figure 54) is one response to this issue. It supplies map-based information, including HER data, to assist farmers and other land mangers in devising appropriate ELS and HLS applications and in meeting their cross-compliance obligations.
HLC in conjunction with other historic data can support the Entry Level Schemes (ELS) and Higher Level Schemes (HLS) under Common Agricultural Policy, replacing the former Countryside Stewardship and ESAs schemes. The Land Management Information Service (LaMIS) illustrated here (figure 54) is one response to this issue. It supplies map-based information, including HER data, to assist farmers and other land mangers in devising appropriate ELS and HLS applications and in meeting their cross-compliance obligations.
At line 635 added 19 lines
!!E.5.8 Case studies
HLC has been used with a variety of forms of historic data either for visual display or interactive analysis in various applications. The difficulties of combining HER and other historic datasets with HLC have been highlighted and examined as parts of various projects involving GIS analysis. Each approach handled the HER and other historic data with HLC in differing ways, in response to various issues and scales of application. These case studies illustrate some of the issues and problems in combining such different forms of historic records.
!Suffolk
In Suffolk HLC has been used as an independent backdrop to select HER point data to compare distribution patterns in Suffolk to the HLC. In addition certain ecological records have been plotted to establish if there are any correlations with distribution and HLC. (E. Martin, pers comm.)
!Scotland
In Scotland a selection of prehistoric (Neolithic and Bronze Age) NMR point data was modelled in comparison to the HLA to see how past land-use affected monument survival and condition; how an RCAHMS Farm Building Survey on Sanday, and the HLA, independently complemented each other; and how RCAHMS fieldwork compared with the HLA on Skye and in the Grampians (Dyson-Bruce et al 1999).
!South East England
The following three case studies were carried out in response to the ODPM’s Sustainable Development reports targeting the South East for circa 1 million new homes in the next 25-30 years. English Heritage sought to develop a series of proactive responses, guiding and informing appropriate development based on modelling ‘historic character’ rather than issuing a series of the more traditional heritage constraints in such scenarios. The London-Cambridge-Stansted Study sought to define a strategic analysis based on sensitivity to inform the process of development. Whereas the Milton Keynes and Thames gateway studies already had pre-defined zones for development and sought to develop integrated historic environment modelling to inform and guide future development in these areas. (Further details of all of the projects are available on the, see details below).
__London-Stansted-Cambridge – M11__ (Went et al 2003): The LSC- M11 work highlighted the problems in taking two radically different HER’s (one monument based, the other event based) in adjacent counties and incorporating them into two county-based HLC’s using the same methodology (see figure 55). The results confirmed that a certain screening or filtering of the HER data was required (which was unfortunately outwith the remit of the project, but is currently being progressed).
%%image-caption
[{Image src='fig55.jpg' alt='FFigure 55: HLC Sensitivity Zones Map from the LCS-M11Study.'}]
''Figure 55: HLC Sensitivity Zones Map from the LCS-M11Study. (©English Heritage 2007, ©Essex County Council 2007 and ©Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. 100019602. 2007 and ©Hertfordshire County Council 2007 and ©Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. 100019606, 2007).''
/%
This page (revision-31) was last changed on 18-Sep-2012 10:40 by Alison BennettTop