This page (revision-31) was last changed on 24-Jan-2017 15:57 by Chris Martin

This page was created on 13-Sep-2012 16:46 by Alison Bennett

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
31 24-Jan-2017 15:57 50 KB Chris Martin to previous
30 24-Jan-2017 15:55 50 KB Chris Martin to previous | to last
29 24-Jan-2017 15:55 50 KB Chris Martin to previous | to last
28 04-Oct-2016 14:15 50 KB Stephanie Leith to previous | to last
27 17-May-2016 16:45 50 KB Chris Martin to previous | to last
26 17-May-2016 16:43 50 KB Chris Martin to previous | to last
25 17-May-2016 16:43 50 KB Chris Martin to previous | to last
24 17-May-2016 16:01 50 KB Chris Martin to previous | to last
23 17-May-2016 15:55 50 KB Chris Martin to previous | to last
22 12-May-2016 16:18 50 KB Chris Martin to previous | to last
21 12-May-2016 16:17 50 KB Chris Martin to previous | to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
SectionE.1
SectionE.1

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 275 changed one line
As expected, the current ‘period of origin’ of most of these 12 HLC records is the 1930s, apart from three dated to the late 1940s and the 1950s. Drawing the HLC polygons also had to take into account the boundaries of the ancient Perry Barr Common (enclosed around 1815) which cut across of the modern estate. This resulted in 4 of the highlighted 12 ‘multi-polygon’ HLC records being purposely drawn so as to lie entirely within the area of the former commons. [{Image src='Birmingham_HLC_Kingstanding.jpg' alt='Birmingham HLC Kingstanding area'}]
As expected, the current ‘period of origin’ of most of these 12 HLC records is the 1930s, apart from three dated to the late 1940s and the 1950s. Drawing the HLC polygons also had to take into account the boundaries of the ancient Perry Barr Common (enclosed around 1815) which cut across of the modern estate. This resulted in 4 of the highlighted 12 ‘multi-polygon’ HLC records being purposely drawn so as to lie entirely within the area of the former commons.
%%image-caption
[{Image src='Birmingham_HLC_Kingstanding.jpg' width=550 alt='Birmingham HLC Kingstanding area'}]
''Figure 56: Birmingham HLC Kingstanding area (©Birmingham City Council 2015).''
/%
At line 281 changed one line
An example of the need to use mixed HLC types is characterising pre-modern Edgbaston – as illustrated by this map from 1718 – manor which lacked a ‘true’ village centre and consisted largely of houses, farms and cottages scattered in groups of two and three at best, including those in the vicinity of Edgbaston Hall and Church (HBM3780) – all record numbers mentioned here are highlighted in red on the map. In order to have any chance of ‘capturing’ at least part of this dispersed pattern, the resulting Birmingham HLC records had to either stay small (e.g. HBM3853 – 1.8 ha or HBM3875 – 1.44 ha), or use the ‘farm and enclosed fields’ mixed HLC type (e.g. HBM3852, HBM3869 or HBM3773, the latter farm located next to its Medieval moated predecessor – HBM3774). Incidentally, the closest thing to an Edgbaston ‘village centre’ in pre-modern times, was the small hamlet at Good Knaves End (top left corner), area covered by only two HLC records: a very small one (HBM3920 – 0.95 ha) and a larger one (HBM3871 – 2.71 ha), larger only because it also includes a small country house and its grounds. [{Image src='1718_Edgbaston_and_HLC.jpg' alt='1718 map of Edgbaston and Birmingham HLC'}]
An example of the need to use mixed HLC types is characterising pre-modern Edgbaston – as illustrated by this map from 1718 – manor which lacked a ‘true’ village centre and consisted largely of houses, farms and cottages scattered in groups of two and three at best, including those in the vicinity of Edgbaston Hall and Church (HBM3780) – all record numbers mentioned here are highlighted in red on the map. In order to have any chance of ‘capturing’ at least part of this dispersed pattern, the resulting Birmingham HLC records had to either stay small (e.g. HBM3853 – 1.8 ha or HBM3875 – 1.44 ha), or use the ‘farm and enclosed fields’ mixed HLC type (e.g. HBM3852, HBM3869 or HBM3773, the latter farm located next to its Medieval moated predecessor – HBM3774). Incidentally, the closest thing to an Edgbaston ‘village centre’ in pre-modern times, was the small hamlet at Good Knaves End (top left corner), area covered by only two HLC records: a very small one (HBM3920 – 0.95 ha) and a larger one (HBM3871 – 2.71 ha), larger only because it also includes a small country house and its grounds.
%%image-caption
[{Image src='1718_Edgbaston_and_HLC.jpg' width=550 alt='1718 map of Edgbaston and Birmingham HLC'}]
''Figure 57: 1718 map of Edgbaston and Birmingham HLC (©Birmingham City Council 2015).''
/%
At line 336 changed one line
''Figure 57: HLA overlay showing a Designed Landscape (©Aberdeenshire Council 2007 and ©Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. 100020767. 2007).''
''Figure 58: HLA overlay showing a Designed Landscape (©Aberdeenshire Council 2007 and ©Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. 100020767. 2007).''
At line 349 changed one line
''Figure 58: SMR overlay showing same Designed Landscape as an archaeological site (©Aberdeenshire Council 2007 and ©Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. 100020767. 2007).''
''Figure 59: SMR overlay showing same Designed Landscape as an archaeological site (©Aberdeenshire Council 2007 and ©Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. 100020767. 2007).''
This page (revision-31) was last changed on 24-Jan-2017 15:57 by Chris MartinTop