J Archaeol Sci 31 (5)

Rank-size analysis of settlement systems in archaeology has focused on departures from log-normality, but it is not clear that a log-normal pattern should ordinarily be expected. The authors argue that direct comparison of observed rank-size curves to each other is of greater utility in identifying chronological change and inter-regional variation in settlement dynamics as reflected in rank-size patterns. A coefficient of shape is proposed to facilitate comparison and to serve as a basis for bootstrap assessment of statistical confidence in any differences that are observed. The approach is illustrated with analysis of archaeological settlement data from sites in different regions of the world. \r\nAuthor Keywords: Author Keywords: Rank-size analysis; Significance testing; Settlement patterns;

Several systems have been devised for the naming of domestic animals but none has gained universal acceptance. Where Latin names of the Linnaean system are used, the majority of wild progenitor species and their domestic derivatives share the same name but in 19 cases there is a tradition of separate names for the wild and domestic forms. Many taxa first described and named by Linnaeus and other authors were either based on domestic animals or encompassed both the wild and domestic forms. Among these are 16 mammals for which the name for the domestic form antedates or is contemporary with that of the wild ancestor and the former has been applied by a few authors to the wild species, creating confusion in the literature. A recent ruling (Opinion 2027, March 2003) by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has fixed the first available specific name based on a wild population for 17 wild progenitor species. It is now recommended that names based on domestic forms be adopted for the corresponding domestic derivatives. \r\n\r\nAuthor Keywords: Author Keywords: Nomenclature; Taxonomy; Mammalia; Osteichthyes; Lepidoptera; Wild progenitor species; Domestic animals